2009
DOI: 10.2172/966984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actinide (III) solubility in WIPP Brine: data summary and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The borate complexation effect in WIPP brine was only recently demonstrated on neodymium(III) [19,31]. Neodymium-tetraborate stability constants were experimentally determined in different NaCl ionic strength solutions and correlated well with the stability constants available in the literature [31] for others metals.…”
Section: Tetraborate Complexationmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The borate complexation effect in WIPP brine was only recently demonstrated on neodymium(III) [19,31]. Neodymium-tetraborate stability constants were experimentally determined in different NaCl ionic strength solutions and correlated well with the stability constants available in the literature [31] for others metals.…”
Section: Tetraborate Complexationmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This dependence is valid for I > 0.5 M. For very low ionic strength solutions (I ∼ 0 M), the correction factor K is close to zero, so pC H + ∼ pH. The correction factors K were equal to 1.23 ± 0.01 for GWB and 0.94 ± 0.02 for ERDA-6 brine [19].…”
Section: Pc H + Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of the high ionic strength of the two simulated WIPP brines was taken into consideration in the determination of reliable hydrogen ion concentrations, using the following equation based on a modified Gran titration method [7]: pC H+ = pH obs + K, where pC H+ is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration in molarity (mol/L or M) units, pH obs the measured/observed pH and K an experimentally determined constant. The correction factor K was found to be (0.94 0.02) for ERDA-6 and (1.23 0.01) for GWB [8]. The level of carbonate in the experiments was maintained by the addition of a small volume of an appropriate intermediate carbonate solution to achieve the desired concentration of carbonate in solution: 2 10 -4 M or 2 10 -3 M. The intermediate carbonate solution was prepared by dissolving a known amount of sodium carbonate in a determined volume of brine.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicated a possible effect of a ligand present in higher amounts in GWB than in ERDA-6, and an effect of the difference in ionic strength between the two brines. Based on our previous investigation of neodymium solubility [8], we postulated that borate may play a role in defining the uranium (VI) solubility in this pC H+ region (7.5 ≤ pC H+ ≤ 8). Three carbonate-free ERDA-6 solutions at an initial pC H+ of 8.1, 9.6 and 10.5 were saturated with a sodium tetraborate solid, reaching a total concentration of ~ 5×10 -2 M tetraborate in solution [9].…”
Section: First Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%