2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93560-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actinopterygians: Head, Jaws and Muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive complexity and diversification of skull anatomy among fishes correlates with highly diverse feeding ecologies (Gidmark et al, 2019; Huby & Parmentier, 2019; Liem, 1993; Martinez et al, 2018). Evolution of several functional units (Huby & Parmentier, 2019) has given rise to a diversity of feeding methods (e.g., ram, suction, biting) for optimal foraging on specific prey types, varying widely within and among species (Huby & Parmentier, 2019; Liem, 1993). Independent evolution of oral jaws, hyoid “jaws” and pharyngeal jaws for prey capture and food processing likely contributed to trophic and morphological diversification (Gidmark et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extensive complexity and diversification of skull anatomy among fishes correlates with highly diverse feeding ecologies (Gidmark et al, 2019; Huby & Parmentier, 2019; Liem, 1993; Martinez et al, 2018). Evolution of several functional units (Huby & Parmentier, 2019) has given rise to a diversity of feeding methods (e.g., ram, suction, biting) for optimal foraging on specific prey types, varying widely within and among species (Huby & Parmentier, 2019; Liem, 1993). Independent evolution of oral jaws, hyoid “jaws” and pharyngeal jaws for prey capture and food processing likely contributed to trophic and morphological diversification (Gidmark et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiations of ecomorphology and associated prey have occurred widely in fishes, including Pomacentridae (Cooper & Westneat, 2009), Labridae (Westneat et al, 2005), and Cichlidae (Mabuchi et al, 2007). While most studies investigate morphological variation among species or higher taxa (Huby & Parmentier, 2019; Konings et al, 2021; Liem, 1993; Martinez et al, 2018; Pauers & McMillan, 2014; Ronco et al, 2021), extensive variation in cranial morphology also exists within species (Kimmel et al, 2015; Pauers & McMillan, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this tagging method caused visible damage to the gills (lamellae tissue loss and discoloration) and operculum (irritation) one week after tagging in the pilot study with dummy devices. Current studies with rainbow trout showed similar results (unpublished results), probably due to fish species differences in head shape and operculum ossification [24]. Therefore, it was necessary to test a new tagging method that took these distinctive features into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This undesirable effect was solved by using corrosion-resistant self-piercing fish tags with a flexible heat shrink polyethylene tube to fit the device, which avoided growth impairment or pathological signs of hemorrhage or tissue damage after 1-3 weeks of tagging (Rosell-Moll et al, 2021). Such approach also works well in flat fish (turbot, sole), but it is not feasible in rainbow trout or Atlantic salmon, probably due to differences in head shape and operculum ossification (Huby and Parmentier, 2019). Indeed, following this tagging protocol, significant tissue damage and necrosis were observed few days post-tagging in both trout and salmon at the level of the piercing location and also on the gill tissue located below.…”
Section: Tagging Methods: How and Wherementioning
confidence: 99%