Writing in The Times newspaper in 1988, the urbanist Colin Ward claimed that 'The "inner city" is an idea, not a place. The words…have become a euphemism for the urban poor.' 1 In many respects, Ward was right. The term 'inner city' emerged in the United States in the 1960s to describe the largely black neighbourhoods surrounding 'downtown' areas shaped by white flight, deindustrialization, the blighting effects of urban renewal and territorial stigmatization wrought by endemic racism. 2 In the wake of a series of urban disorders across many US cities during the 'long hot summer' of 1967, these inner-city areas became a focus for increasing anxiety and demonization within political and media discourse. 3 With more than half an eye on events in the US, a similar nexus of anxiety around race, poverty and the city came to the fore in Britain, where commentators borrowed heavily from the American repertoire of tropes and terminologies with which to narrateand often sensationalizewhat was increasingly presented as a looming urban crisis. Such fears were given a highly inflammatory shot in the arm in April 1968, when Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech explicitly raised the prospect of violent racial conflict on the streets of Britain's cities. 4 Alongside cultural fears and racist agonizing over US-style disorders came the ideational inner city. The term was applied first by political and media commentators, and then sociologists and policy-makers, to particular areas of Britain's largest citiesmost especially those in which significant black, Asian and ethnic minority communities lived. 5 Here, the 'inner city' wasand often still iseuphemistically associated with communities of colour living in large urban