Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements: Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis

Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS• The role of motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) methods was examined.• We analyzed brain correlates underlying learning of a complex coordination task.• Different activation patterns related to EEG spectral bands were elicited by AO and MI.• AO showed a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution.• AO may be more effective than MI in promoting early motor learning. ABSTRACTMotor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.

Action observation training enhances upper extremity function in subacute stroke survivor with moderate impairment: a double-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial

“…Brunner et al, (2014) reported that this improvement in motor performance may be related to activation in the inferior temporal gyrus and the thalamus, and movementrelated areas, such as premotor, supplementary, and motor cortex during action observation. Gonzalez-Rosa et al, (2015) reported action observation was associated with greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions, compared with motor imagery and control groups.…”

Motor Imagery and Action Observation as Effective Tools for Physical Therapy

“…Gatti et al revealed that action observation is superior to motor imagery in the early stages of new complex motor learning, as shown by behavioral [41] and EEG data [42]. As described above, motor imagery is influenced by the environment, personal imaging ability, and mental effort.…”

Understanding Neural Mechanisms of Action Observation for Improving Human Motor Skill Acquisition

“…In the early stages of new complex motor learning, action observation is superior to motor imagery as a strategy for motor learning, as revealed by behavioral [33] and EEG data ( Figure 7) [34]. Motor imagery is influenced by the environment and personal imaging ability and requires mental effort.…”

“…In other words, motor learning is Figure 7. Cortical activation patterns in the action observation (AO), motor imagery (MI), and control (C) groups [34]. Average TRPow (task-related power) changes with respect to resting baseline, within the two frequency bands showing significant group effects, were interpolated and projected onto an average brain cortical surface.…”