2016
DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2016.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action of Cleistanthins A and B on Alpha Adrenoceptors in Rats

Abstract: Objectives: Cleistanthins A and B (CAB), active phytochemicals present in Cleistanthus collinus, have been proven to have alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking property. However action on alpha 2-adrenoceptor is not studied. We aimed to study the action of CAB on alpha 2-adrenoceptor by measuring platelet aggregation, insulin and blood glucose levels with yohimbine as a standard comparator control and alpha 1-adrenoceptor by measuring the blockade of relaxation induced by phenylephrine in the jejunum of Wistar albino … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Another study from our lab has also demonstrated that cleistanthins A and B inhibit both α 1 adrenergic receptors (in jejunum) and α 2 adrenergic receptors (in platelets) in rats. 31 But in our experiment, cleistanthin A did not demonstrate a significant inhibition in the dose ranges used. The reason for this might be the fact that the lower concentration of cleistanthin A in the solution and higher concentration of ethanol might have interfered in the inhibition process leading to an altered response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…24 Another study from our lab has also demonstrated that cleistanthins A and B inhibit both α 1 adrenergic receptors (in jejunum) and α 2 adrenergic receptors (in platelets) in rats. 31 But in our experiment, cleistanthin A did not demonstrate a significant inhibition in the dose ranges used. The reason for this might be the fact that the lower concentration of cleistanthin A in the solution and higher concentration of ethanol might have interfered in the inhibition process leading to an altered response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%