1992
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90459-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action profiles of smoking and caffeine: Stroop effect, EEG, and peripheral physiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
52
2
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
52
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25,45,46 Thus, caffeine's cognitive enhancing effects may be most evident only for some aspects of processing or when the drug is administered to regular users following a period of abstinence. 46,47 This study provided little evidence that the effects of nicotine are influenced by concurrent caffeine (with the exception of working memory accuracy as noted above) and is consistent with other studies examining the combination of these drugs in nonsmoking, moderatecaffeine-consuming individuals. 21,22 This observation may suggest that the coadministration of tobacco and caffeine-containing beverages reflects a behavioral rather than pharmacological mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…25,45,46 Thus, caffeine's cognitive enhancing effects may be most evident only for some aspects of processing or when the drug is administered to regular users following a period of abstinence. 46,47 This study provided little evidence that the effects of nicotine are influenced by concurrent caffeine (with the exception of working memory accuracy as noted above) and is consistent with other studies examining the combination of these drugs in nonsmoking, moderatecaffeine-consuming individuals. 21,22 This observation may suggest that the coadministration of tobacco and caffeine-containing beverages reflects a behavioral rather than pharmacological mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Some studies found that administration of nicotine per se (Provost and Woodward, 1991) or cigarette smoking (Hasenfratz and Battig, 1992;Provost and Woodward, 1991) decreased the Stroop effect in nonsmokers (Provost and Woodward, 1991) or smokers smoking ad libitum (Hasenfratz and Battig, 1992;Provost and Woodward, 1991). These reports suggested that nicotine had an absolute facilitating effect on focusing of attention, but other observations did not support this view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A large body of evidence suggests that nicotine can improve measures of attention in smokers (Wesnes and Warburton, 1983;Parrott and Craig, 1992;Leigh et al, 1977;Hasenfratz and Battig, 1992;Rodway et al, 2000). Attentional improvements after nicotine administration in nonsmokers are, however, controversial (Heishman et al, 1993;Heishman and Henningfield, 2000;Foulds et al, 1996;Levin et al, 1998).…”
Section: Behavioral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%