2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7472003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action recognition using interest points capturing differential motion information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Method Database split Training time Processing speed s1 scenario Full database Yadav et al 30 IP + SVM 80%-20% ---98.20% Shi et al 31 DTD, DNN 9-16 ---95.6% Kovashka et al 32 BoW + SVM 8-8-9 ---94.53% Gilbert et al 33 HCF + SVM LOOCV ∼ 5.6 h 24 fps -94.5% Baccouche et al 34 CNN & RNN 16-9 ---94.39% Ali and Wang 35 DBN & SVM 50%-20%-30% ---94.3% Wang et al 36 DT + SVM 16-9 ---94.2% Liu et al 37 MMI + SVM LOOCV ---94.15% Sun et al 38 FT + SVM auto ---94.0% Veeriah et al 39 Differential 46 MT cells 16-9 --74.63% -Schuldt et al 22 FT + SVM 8-8-9 ---71.83% Table 1. Performance of various state-of-the-art digital approaches compared to our best experimental result.…”
Section: Performance Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method Database split Training time Processing speed s1 scenario Full database Yadav et al 30 IP + SVM 80%-20% ---98.20% Shi et al 31 DTD, DNN 9-16 ---95.6% Kovashka et al 32 BoW + SVM 8-8-9 ---94.53% Gilbert et al 33 HCF + SVM LOOCV ∼ 5.6 h 24 fps -94.5% Baccouche et al 34 CNN & RNN 16-9 ---94.39% Ali and Wang 35 DBN & SVM 50%-20%-30% ---94.3% Wang et al 36 DT + SVM 16-9 ---94.2% Liu et al 37 MMI + SVM LOOCV ---94.15% Sun et al 38 FT + SVM auto ---94.0% Veeriah et al 39 Differential 46 MT cells 16-9 --74.63% -Schuldt et al 22 FT + SVM 8-8-9 ---71.83% Table 1. Performance of various state-of-the-art digital approaches compared to our best experimental result.…”
Section: Performance Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been the approach adopted by [43]. There are also attempts to implement k ‐ mean clustering method directly on HOG or HOF [33, 78] while others simply used HOF on selected and tracked points from TOPs and concatenate them to form a descriptor [28]. Ding and Qu extracted SIFT features from the selected interest points and then used BoW to construct the visual word in order to build the vocabulary for the feature descriptors.…”
Section: Updated Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [62], on the other hand, computed only the optical flow information based on the detected STIP. A slightly different approach has been proposed by Yadav et al [28]. Their interest points are based on curl optical flow points that are above some prefixed threshold which are then densely tracked within 15 frames so as to collect temporal information.…”
Section: Updated Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kovashka and Grauman (2010) Hierarchical Space time neighborhood features 94.53% Our Bag of Expression (BoE) 96.68% Wang et al (2011) Dense Trajectories 84.20% Yadav et al (2016) Motion Boundaries and Dense Trajectories 91.30% Mota et al (2013) Tenser Motion Descriptor 75.40% Liu et al (2009) Bag of visual words 71.20% Our Bag of Expression (BoE) 93.42% Duta et al (2017) HMG + iDT Descriptor 93.00% Bag of Words and Fusion Methods 92.30% Wang et al (2016) Dense Trajectories 91.70%…”
Section: Kthmentioning
confidence: 99%