“…(5) follows from (l)- (4) (1) for all h,l G H. Applying id g £ to both sides, we obtain t(h, I) = e(hl)l, so that t is trivial. This yields the second assertion.…”
Section: (3) a G H£ If And Only If Ah = (P£(h)a = Ha For All Fc G // mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 4.5(2) is true for (ipi,r), t(H x H) Ç Z(A), and the right side of 4.5(1) for (ipu,cr) becomes (1) so that this yields 4.5(1) for (ipu,o). Conversely, 4.5(1) for (ipu,<^) yields 4.5(1) for (ipf,r), using the invertibility of u.…”
Section: (3) a G H£ If And Only If Ah = (P£(h)a = Ha For All Fc G // mentioning
ABSTRACT.This paper develops a theory of crossed products and inner (weak) actions of arbitrary Hopf algebras on noncommutative algebras. The theory covers the usual examples of inner automorphisms and derivations, and in addition is general enough to include "inner" group gradings of algebras.
“…(5) follows from (l)- (4) (1) for all h,l G H. Applying id g £ to both sides, we obtain t(h, I) = e(hl)l, so that t is trivial. This yields the second assertion.…”
Section: (3) a G H£ If And Only If Ah = (P£(h)a = Ha For All Fc G // mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 4.5(2) is true for (ipi,r), t(H x H) Ç Z(A), and the right side of 4.5(1) for (ipu,cr) becomes (1) so that this yields 4.5(1) for (ipu,o). Conversely, 4.5(1) for (ipu,<^) yields 4.5(1) for (ipf,r), using the invertibility of u.…”
Section: (3) a G H£ If And Only If Ah = (P£(h)a = Ha For All Fc G // mentioning
ABSTRACT.This paper develops a theory of crossed products and inner (weak) actions of arbitrary Hopf algebras on noncommutative algebras. The theory covers the usual examples of inner automorphisms and derivations, and in addition is general enough to include "inner" group gradings of algebras.
“…. , wt(b jq+2 · · · b (j+1)q ) are distinct non-identity elements of H since they are equal to the respective elements in (1 are distinct non-identity elements of H for h from (2). Now take 0 = c…”
Section: Identities Of Graded Algebras and Codimension Growth 3945mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is quite different in the case of finite groups. It is well known that A = ⊕ g∈G A g is a PI-algebra if and only if A e satisfies a non-trivial polynomial identity provided that |G| < ∞ [1]. Moreover, even if G is infinite but the number of elements g ∈ G such that A g = 0 is finite, any non-trivial identity of A e implies a non-trivial identity on whole of A (see [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if A e is nilpotent and G finite, then it is not hard to show that A is also nilpotent. If A e satisfies a standard identity of degree m, then A satisfies a power of the standard identity of degree dm where d = |G| [1]. If A e satisfies an identity of degree d, then A has a non-trivial identity of degree bounded by a function of d and |G| (see [2], [3]).…”
Abstract. Let A = ⊕ g∈G Ag be a G-graded associative algebra over a field of characteristic zero. In this paper we develop a conjecture that relates the exponent of the growth of polynomial identities of the identity component Ae to that of the whole of A, in the case where the support of the grading is finite. We prove the conjecture in several natural cases, one of them being the case where A is finite dimensional and Ae has polynomial growth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.