1989
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1989.137.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actions of discrete amenable groups on injective factors of type IIIλ, λ1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many interesting cases, this orbit turns out to consist of a single element as we will see in Section 6. This invariant can be regarded as an analogue of the modular invariant of Sutherland-Takesaki [35] and the symbol ν comes from this analogy. See Section 6 for more on this analogy.…”
Section: New Invariants -An Algebraic Approach -mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many interesting cases, this orbit turns out to consist of a single element as we will see in Section 6. This invariant can be regarded as an analogue of the modular invariant of Sutherland-Takesaki [35] and the symbol ν comes from this analogy. See Section 6 for more on this analogy.…”
Section: New Invariants -An Algebraic Approach -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then study Hecke algebra subfactors of Wenzl constructed in [37]. Finally, we discuss analogy between our classification here and the classification of automorphisms of injective type III factors in [9], [25], [35].…”
Section: Examples and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, U(R) is the semi direct product of U(R) by the extended modular action of Z 1 (F (R)) as in [14]. Except for the lower right corner H 1 (F (R)), all groups are Polish and all maps are continuous.…”
Section: Intrinsic Invariant and Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our idea of a proof is using the continuous decomposition instead of the discrete decomposition based on the method in [14] and [15]. But in this case, we treat 2054 TOSHIHIKO MASUDA only factors of type III λ , 0 < λ < 1, with the trivial characteristic invariants, so the proof is less complicated than those in [14] and [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in this case, we treat 2054 TOSHIHIKO MASUDA only factors of type III λ , 0 < λ < 1, with the trivial characteristic invariants, so the proof is less complicated than those in [14] and [15]. By using the continuous decomposition, we can more easily reduce the classification problem to the type II ∞ case than using the discrete decomposition and this method is valid for arbitrary discrete amenable groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%