2010
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actions of monoidally equivalent compact quantum groups and applications to probabilistic boundaries

Abstract: In [6], Bichon, De Rijdt and Vaes introduced the notion of monoidally equivalent compact quantum groups. In this paper we prove that there is a natural bijective correspondence between actions of monoidally equivalent quantum groups on unital C * -algebras or on von Neumann algebras. We apply this correspondence to study the behavior of Poisson and Martin boundaries under monoidal equivalence of quantum groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the converse may not hold since it is not clear that any torsion module of R G can be traced back to a torsion action of G. However, we will see that knowing the torsion modules of R G is often enough to understand the torsion actions of G. Let us conclude by a remark on the link between torsion actions and monoidal equivalence which will be crucial. If G and H are monoidally equivalent compact quantum groups in the sense of [6], then there is a one-to-one correspondence between their actions which was explicitly described in [8]. Moreover, this correspondence can be lifted to an equivalence of categories which preserves finitedimensionality and ergodicity as explained in [20,Sec 8].…”
Section: Definition 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the converse may not hold since it is not clear that any torsion module of R G can be traced back to a torsion action of G. However, we will see that knowing the torsion modules of R G is often enough to understand the torsion actions of G. Let us conclude by a remark on the link between torsion actions and monoidal equivalence which will be crucial. If G and H are monoidally equivalent compact quantum groups in the sense of [6], then there is a one-to-one correspondence between their actions which was explicitly described in [8]. Moreover, this correspondence can be lifted to an equivalence of categories which preserves finitedimensionality and ergodicity as explained in [20,Sec 8].…”
Section: Definition 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in [11], the authors prove that the same construction with the inverse monoidal equivalence ϕ −1 will give D 1 again up to isomorphism. Theorem 1.17.…”
Section: Monoidal Equivalences Between Compact Quantum Groupsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is even more, De Rijdt and Vander Vennet proved in [11] that there exists a bijection between actions of monoidal equivalent compact quantum groups. Indeed, let G 1 and G 2 be two compact quantum groups, ϕ : G 1 → G 2 be a monoidal equivalence between them.…”
Section: Monoidal Equivalences Between Compact Quantum Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 9.3. It is also worth mentioning that Theorem 9.1 has also been used together with monoidal equivalence and free product results from [36] and [35] to obtain analogous results for the discrete duals of quantum automorphism groups of finite dimensional C˚-algebras.…”
Section: Application: Approximation Properties For Free Quantum Groupsmentioning
confidence: 96%