1967
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.163.1308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation Cross Sections for theF19(n,2n)F18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows a comparison of the presently evaluated (n, 2n) cross section with the experimental data. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] The JENDL-3. The (n, 2n) reaction cross sections around the threshold energy are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Inelastic Scattering Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows a comparison of the presently evaluated (n, 2n) cross section with the experimental data. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] The JENDL-3. The (n, 2n) reaction cross sections around the threshold energy are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Inelastic Scattering Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -12 MeV is the optimum production energy interval for this reaction. Uno et al, 1996Menlove et al, 1967Grundl et al, 1958Mannhart et al, 2007 It can be said by considering the investigated reactions in this study that the cross-section calculation results obtained by pre-equilibrium models are in better harmony with the experimental data rather than the equilibrium models. Hauser-Feshbach models, which are equilibrium models, were not compatible with the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…"Demokritos". [18,20,22,24,27,28], 165 Ho(n,2n) 164 Ho m [22,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and 165 Ho(n,2n) 164 Ho g [22, 29, 31-33, 37, 38] reactions, along with ENDF/B-VIII.0 library [39] when this is available.…”
Section: The Nuclear Reactions and The Previous Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%