1996
DOI: 10.1007/s004240050230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation kinetics of Glutamate receptor channels from wild-type Drosophila muscle

Abstract: Outside-out patches from wild-type Drosophila larval muscle were exposed briefly to L-Glutamate (Glu) using a piezo-driven application system. Glu in concentrations of 0.1 to 30 mM was applied and the responses to repeated applications of a given concentration were averaged. The peak current, î, and the current rise time, tr, from 0.1 î to 0.9 î were determined from the averages. Half-maximum activation of the channels was reached with approximately 2 mM Glu. î increased proportional to the power n = 3. 5 to n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both GluRIIA and GluRIIB subtypes have a similar, low sensitivity to glutamate, EC 50 3 and 6 mM, respectively, which agrees well with the EC 50 of 2 mM obtained using singlechannel analysis for native Drosophila NMJ iGluRs (19). Similarly, in larval NMJ preparations, only L-glutamate mimicked the action of the natural neurotransmitter among many agonists tested, including aspartic acid (2), which also produced no response in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Both GluRIIA and GluRIIB subtypes have a similar, low sensitivity to glutamate, EC 50 3 and 6 mM, respectively, which agrees well with the EC 50 of 2 mM obtained using singlechannel analysis for native Drosophila NMJ iGluRs (19). Similarly, in larval NMJ preparations, only L-glutamate mimicked the action of the natural neurotransmitter among many agonists tested, including aspartic acid (2), which also produced no response in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our data suggest that constitutive desensitization is, on a longer time scale (hours), also associated with removal of receptors from the synapse. The EC 50 for activation of Drosophila larval muscle glutamate receptors is ϳ2 mM (Heckmann et al, 1996), and significant numbers of receptors can be desensitized at considerably lower concentrations (Heckmann and Dudel, 1997). Because 2 mM is near the concentration of glutamate bathing NMJ receptors in vivo (McDonald, 1975;Echalier, 1997;Pierce et al, 1999) (our unpublished results), we must conclude that one-half or more of Drosophila larval muscle glutamate receptors are constitutively desensitized, and therefore delocalized, in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Reminiscent to obvious expression of its mammalian homolog in border areas of the brain, Gb is expressed in surface glia of the CNS and within a particular glia cell (now termed Gb cell) associated with NMJs. Compared to ambient glutamate concentrations in the mammalian brain, which are normally in a low micromolar range (Featherstone and Shippy 2008), glutamate concentrations in the larval hemolymph are in a millimolar range, yet close to the level required for half-maximal activation of junctional receptors (Heckmann et al 1996). Loss of Gb causes an~50% reduction in hemolymph glutamate concentration.…”
Section: Control Of Synaptic Glurs By Ambient Glutamatementioning
confidence: 99%