1984
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90237-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of brain regions in rats during food-intake operant behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autoradiographic techniques using glucose analogues (Sokoloff et al ., 1977; Sokoloff, 1992), such as deoxyglucose and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), have increased the ability to study the functioning nervous system, including behavioural and learning effects (e.g. Martinez et al ., 1982; Morimoto et al ., 1984; Harvey et al ., 1988; Cahill et al ., 1996; Bontempi et al ., 1999; Landers & Sullivan, 1999; Prins & Hovda, 2001). Previous FDG studies in this laboratory have investigated learning effects that involve different components of behavioural inhibition such as habituation (Gonzalez‐Lima et al ., 1989), differential auditory conditioning (Gonzalez‐Lima & Agudo, 1990; Gonzalez‐Lima, 1992), Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (McIntosh & Gonzalez‐Lima, 1994, 1995), and extinction of instrumental behaviour (Nair & Gonzalez‐Lima, 1999; Nair et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoradiographic techniques using glucose analogues (Sokoloff et al ., 1977; Sokoloff, 1992), such as deoxyglucose and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), have increased the ability to study the functioning nervous system, including behavioural and learning effects (e.g. Martinez et al ., 1982; Morimoto et al ., 1984; Harvey et al ., 1988; Cahill et al ., 1996; Bontempi et al ., 1999; Landers & Sullivan, 1999; Prins & Hovda, 2001). Previous FDG studies in this laboratory have investigated learning effects that involve different components of behavioural inhibition such as habituation (Gonzalez‐Lima et al ., 1989), differential auditory conditioning (Gonzalez‐Lima & Agudo, 1990; Gonzalez‐Lima, 1992), Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (McIntosh & Gonzalez‐Lima, 1994, 1995), and extinction of instrumental behaviour (Nair & Gonzalez‐Lima, 1999; Nair et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite potential problems with the technique suggested by these concerns, the pattern of results from this initial analysis argues for its utility and validity. The data reveal a sensitivity to changes in neural activity in regions logically consistent with ingestive responding and oral sensory stimulation (many of these have been shown to become active in DG studies with adults; e.g., Gonzalez & Sharp, 1985;Morimoto, Suzumi, Sakata, & Murakami, 1984;Roberts, 1980). With the exception of some interesting and consistent decreases in activity in the thalamus, few other shifts in activity were identified in these brains, results suggesting that the procedures were not capriciously turning up differences from data sampling or density transformation artifacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The former area in the parietal cortex is involved with direct taste perception, as it contains the somatosensory maps of the mouth, lips, and tongue. The cerebellum has been suggested to play an important role in the control of food intake, since glucose uptake there increased during bar pressing behavior anticipating food reward in rats [9], while stimulation of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus affected the neuronal activity of the lateral hypothalamic area [10]. The involvement of the above brain regions in the physiological cerebral response to palatable food sensing was confirmed in a cross-over study in 12 healthy lean subjects (mean BMI 24 kg/m 2 ) who were exposed to the sight, smell, and taste of either a palatable or neutral (non-food) stimuli on two separate days [11].…”
Section: Brain Glucose Metabolism and Blood Flow In Obesity: The Cerementioning
confidence: 99%