2007
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4353428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of Forearm Muscles for Wrist Extension in Patients Affected by Lateral Epicondylitis

Abstract: Work related upper extremity disorders are associated with cumulative trauma resulting from the continuous use of forearm muscles rather than from a specific incident. The aim of this work is to compare wrist extensor muscles activation between patients with lateral epicondylitis and healthy subjects. Differences can be used in the design of rehabilitation or injury prevention programs according to biomechanical deficits. Surface EMG signals from three forearm extensor muscles (Carpi Radialis-ECR, Digitorum Co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, recent research in non-tennis populations has also theorised that impaired activation of 100 forearm muscles may contribute to the development of LE by altering normal agonist-antagonist relationship (muscle imbalance) and subsequent joint misalignment (Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007a;Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007b;Blanchette and Normand, 2011;Rojas et al, 2007). Encouraging clinical outcome of wrist muscle strengthening programmes designed to restore the balance between wrist extensor and flexor groups has supported this theory (Cullinane et al, 2014;Raman et al, 2012;105 Tyler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implications For the Assessment Of Forearm Muscle Function 70mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, recent research in non-tennis populations has also theorised that impaired activation of 100 forearm muscles may contribute to the development of LE by altering normal agonist-antagonist relationship (muscle imbalance) and subsequent joint misalignment (Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007a;Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007b;Blanchette and Normand, 2011;Rojas et al, 2007). Encouraging clinical outcome of wrist muscle strengthening programmes designed to restore the balance between wrist extensor and flexor groups has supported this theory (Cullinane et al, 2014;Raman et al, 2012;105 Tyler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implications For the Assessment Of Forearm Muscle Function 70mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a matter of fact, isometric strength tests only partially relate to functional muscle activity, kinematics, and joint forces during (Wilson and Murphy, 1996). A substantial body of research has emerged to address this issue using EMG examination of the forearm muscles particularly in non-tennis populations (Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007a;Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007b;Blanchette and Normand, 2011;Rojas et al, 2007;Wilson and Murphy, 1996). The first 115 reports describing the use of surface and fine-wire EMG were published in the (Tönnis, 1965) and since then research in the field has continued to offer sports professionals and clinicians with in depth knowledge of relevant muscle activity primarily focusing on the function of wrist extensors and flexors.…”
Section: Implications For the Assessment Of Forearm Muscle Function 70mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of ECR was also reduced in Rojas et al (2007). In this study, activity of the wrist extensor muscles (i.e.…”
Section: Changes To Muscle Activationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The NGF model of sustained elbow pain can also be applied more broadly. For instance, to investigate whether the altered patterns of forearm muscle activation in chronic LE (Alizadehkhaiyat et al 2007; Rojas et al 2007) are also found when at the onset of elbow pain and when it is sustained for several days.…”
Section: What Is the Relationship Between Changes To Varelements In Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the nine included studies, seven investigated individuals with current symptoms of LE with comparison against data for pain-free controls (Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2007;Bauer & Murray, 1999;Calder et al, 2008;Chourasia et al, 2012;Dessureault et al, 2008a;Kelley, Lombardo, Pink, Perry, & Giangarra, 1994;Schabrun et al, 2014), and two investigated individuals who had recovered from LE and LE-free controls (Alizadehkhaiyat et al, 2009;Rojas, Mañanas, Müller, & Chaler, 2007). Only two outcomes were investigated by more than one study that investigated the same muscles, but these studies included the same sample group and were written by the same author, therefore meta-analysis was not possible.…”
Section: Neuromuscular Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%