1997
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation without Selection: Parallel Right Hemisphere Roles in Language and Intentional Movement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this issue is yet to be resolved, and we believe that words are used primarily as a means of conveying meaning, we will adopt the former view and assume that priming involves access to lexical and semantic memory. This is consistent with the approach adopted by other researchers investigating linguistic processing in the cerebral hemispheres (e.g., Chiarello, 1998;Koivisto, 1997Koivisto, , 1999Richards & Chiarello, 1997). It must be noted, however, that if the alternative view is adopted, the current study could simply be re-framed as an investigation of the relative contribution of each hemisphere to the recognition of low-imagery words (which is also a worthwhile venture given the conflicting findings on this issue).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As this issue is yet to be resolved, and we believe that words are used primarily as a means of conveying meaning, we will adopt the former view and assume that priming involves access to lexical and semantic memory. This is consistent with the approach adopted by other researchers investigating linguistic processing in the cerebral hemispheres (e.g., Chiarello, 1998;Koivisto, 1997Koivisto, , 1999Richards & Chiarello, 1997). It must be noted, however, that if the alternative view is adopted, the current study could simply be re-framed as an investigation of the relative contribution of each hemisphere to the recognition of low-imagery words (which is also a worthwhile venture given the conflicting findings on this issue).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…If a related stimulus (called the target) is subsequently presented, responses are facilitated relative to conditions where the target is preceded by an unrelated prime. ''Priming'' effects are calculated by comparing responses to the same target as a function of the relationship with the prime (e.g., BLUE-SKY cf TIGER-1 Some researchers argue that the priming procedure is a useful index of access to semantic memory (e.g., Bleasdale, 1987;deGroot, 1983;Richards & Chiarello, 1997) while others view ''priming'' as simply a reflection of access to lexical memory, which subserves word recognition (e.g., Fodor, 1983;Seidenberg, 1985b). As this issue is yet to be resolved, and we believe that words are used primarily as a means of conveying meaning, we will adopt the former view and assume that priming involves access to lexical and semantic memory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with its activation pattern during hand-selection phase, dlPFC seems especially important in the presence of competing action representations (Rowe et al, 2000;Hadland et al, 2001;Schumacher et al, 2003). Furthermore, the engagement of primarily the right dlPFC and the functionally interconnected right IPL (Fincham et al, 2002;Dosenbach et al, 2006) corroborates that the right hemisphere has a prime role in action planning under conditions of spatial uncertainty (Schumacher et al, 2003;Weiss et al, 2006;Goel et al, 2007) and especially if exploratory processes and external cues are involved (Goldberg et al, 1994;Richards and Chiarello, 1997). In contrast, the left dlPFC would principally handle nonspatial selections (Schumacher et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Right-brain problem solving generates a matrix of alternative solutions, as contrasted with the left brain's single solution of best fit (Brownell, 1988;Tucker and Williamson, 1984). This answer matrix remains active while alternative solutions are explored (Richards and Chiarello, 1997), a method suitable for the open-ended possibilities inherent in a novel situation.…”
Section: The Inability To Assimilate Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%