2007
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2007.4417917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active and cooperative learning in a freshman digital design course: impact on persistence in engineering and student motivational orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with demonstrated that there is a statistical difference between the TC and FC formats, with statistically significant improvements in FC. These findings are consistent or better than those reported in other research studies [7], [8], [10]- [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results obtained with demonstrated that there is a statistical difference between the TC and FC formats, with statistically significant improvements in FC. These findings are consistent or better than those reported in other research studies [7], [8], [10]- [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In brief, this educational technique has two parts: interactive group learning activities inside the classroom, and technology-based independent learning activities outside the classroom [3]. Emerging research indicates that students in a flipped classroom become more aware of their learning, make connections to course content, and improve their learning [4]- [12]. A research survey by Bishop and Verleger [3] provides an extensive literature review of FCs, while demonstrating that there is a lack of evidence about FCs in FY ET curricula.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear from students' responses to open-ended questions that they feel close to same-age and same gender agents. As engineering is perceived as a difficult topic [29][30] [31], middle school students tend to choose a fun personality engineering tutor compared to a serious one, primarily to keep the topic interesting and enjoyable, as well as a slow rate of speech to help them to follow easier and understand better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El más frecuente ha consistido en la aplicación de una encuesta en la que se demanda a los estudiantes su opinión acerca de su carga de trabajo. Bien sea a partir de una escala de likert (Bachman y Bachman, 2006;Spronken-Smith, 2005;Cope y Staehr, 2005) o con preguntas abiertas (Reisslein, Tylavsky, Matar, Seeling y Reisslein, 2007), este procedimiento ha probado su eficacia para observar la percepción de los estudiantes pero no para medir su dedicación en horas. Otro método ha implicado la distribución de formularios al final de curso de forma que los estudiantes estimaran el tiempo promedio dedicado por semana (Lawless, 2000;Zuriff, 2003), procedimiento que ha sido criticado por la poca precisión de las estimaciones que los estudiantes podían hacer a partir del recuerdo (Chambers, 1992).…”
unclassified