2018 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits, Technologies and Applications (ICTA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cicta.2018.8706071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Antenna Array Diagnosis from Far-Field Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, if α j parameters are determined via the active element patterns [22], then the impacts of the mutual coupling are considered in full as against the N full wave EM simulations for each measurement point. There are more methods in literature that include AEAP [23] and PLCM methods [24,25] (reference [26] is recommended for quality review). Since the mutual coupling model is changeable based on the computational resource that is available, the measured field can be mathematically expressed as [9]…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if α j parameters are determined via the active element patterns [22], then the impacts of the mutual coupling are considered in full as against the N full wave EM simulations for each measurement point. There are more methods in literature that include AEAP [23] and PLCM methods [24,25] (reference [26] is recommended for quality review). Since the mutual coupling model is changeable based on the computational resource that is available, the measured field can be mathematically expressed as [9]…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there will always be a demand for fast and accurate complex antenna systems diagnosis, to resolve the unacceptable radiation pattern distortion caused by element (s) failure in the array (Figure .1). Many antenna array diagnosis methods, based on genetic algorithms [1], [2], exhaustive search [3], matrix inversion [4], and MUSIC [5], have been developed in literature to identify faulty antenna elements in an array. All the methods compare the array under test (AUT) with the radiation pattern of an "error free" reference array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the methods compare the array under test (AUT) with the radiation pattern of an "error free" reference array. All the methods in [1][2][3][4][5] need big measurement samples for large antenna arrays, to get reliable diagnosis. Reducing the measurement samples, compressive sensing (CS) based techniques have been reported in [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation