Active citizenship in Europe: the role of social capital

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show if and to what extent in the EU countries the probability of being an active citizen depends on individual/household social capital endowment, other than on individual/household socio-economic characteristics. The paper provides a deeper insight of the determinants of active citizenship due to the growing concern of the European Commission with citizens’ issues. Design/methodology/approach The core of the paper, which adopts a micro-level perspective, is an empirical analysis, based on a logistic model, of the EU-SILC 2015 survey data. Findings The statistical analysis reveals that individual/household social capital, other than individual/household socio-economic characteristics, represents an important prerequisite for a citizen to be defined as “active.” Research limitations/implications There may be a possible reverse causation between active citizenship and social capital, making this last endogenous. Therefore, results should be taken with some cautions; nevertheless, the estimated effects of the individual/household socio-economic characteristics are coherent with the literature, giving strenght to the results obtained in estimating social capital effects. Practical implications The results show that active citizenship could be enhanced by promoting “desirable” aspects of social capital through specific policies addressed to raise people’s civic and political awareness, active solidarity and connectedness and cooperation between individuals within the communities for their own benefit. Moreover, a crucial role in enhancing active citizenship can be undoubtedly played by a lifelong learning process, from school to adult age, directed to maintain and acquire skills as drivers for active citizenship. Originality/value This study fills a significant gap in the literature, since so far little attention has been paid to individual/household social capital endowment as possible determinant of active citizenship.

Revisiting the Concept of Values Taught in Education through Carroll’s Corporate Social Responsibility

“…Yet, it does not clearly link civic responsibility to obedience to the law, which is seen as a mandatory responsibility [95]. Whereas the rule of law sets the principle of governance [96] and is seen as the baseline principle in Carroll's CSR [64], civic responsibility includes citizens' compliance with the rule of law [97], the act of which must be governed by justice, truth, and rationality. This view is inspired by the discussion of the case of Socrates (e.g., [58,98]), who suggested that people should not obey only those laws that they like or that may result in a good verdict for them [98].…”

Budućnost Evropske unije nakon pandemije Kovid 19: kreiranje novog evropskog narativa

“…87 Aktivno građanstvo je i dalje nedovoljno razvijeno u EU, budući da se samo 12,6% građana EU može podvesti po ovaj pojam. 88 Lahuzen i Tejz (Lahusen & Theiss) ističu da su politička osvešćenost, znanje i aktivne participacije (na primer, učešće na izborima, članstvo u građanskim organizacijama i učešće u građanskim inicijativama) ključne odrednice aktivnog građanstva koje vode ka razvijanju transnacionalne solidarnosti, budući da građanima EU pružaju građanske veštine, koje su im neophodne kako bi se uključili u podršku prava drugih Evropljana. 89 Prema istraživanju Lahuzena i Tejza, građani Unije su uglavnom uključeni u inicijative i akcije solidarnosti na nacionalnom nivou, kao izvan Evropske unije, sa samo jednim od četiri ispitanika posvećenih podršci drugim građanima EU.…”