2002
DOI: 10.1039/b109911f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active control of product selection in a chemical reaction: a view of the current scene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid arrows in the diagrams shown in Figure 1 correspond to n e Àiwt interactions (photon annihilation or bra interaction) and are given by E n while the dashed arrows correspond to m e iwt interactions (photon creation or ket interaction) and are given by E* m in Equation (5). The Fourier image of this field defines the spectral amplitude of effective nonlinear electric field given in Equation (6):…”
Section: The Effect Of Phase Modulation On Nonlinear Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The solid arrows in the diagrams shown in Figure 1 correspond to n e Àiwt interactions (photon annihilation or bra interaction) and are given by E n while the dashed arrows correspond to m e iwt interactions (photon creation or ket interaction) and are given by E* m in Equation (5). The Fourier image of this field defines the spectral amplitude of effective nonlinear electric field given in Equation (6):…”
Section: The Effect Of Phase Modulation On Nonlinear Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the recognition that the Chen-Shapiro-Brumer strong field approach 2 to the control of photodissociation can be regarded as a five-level extension of STIRAP, 5,6 there has been a renewed interest in studies of controlled molecular dynamics from a STIRAP perspective. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Two features inherent to STIRAP-like dynamics are particularly appealing to theoretical studies. First, the molecular dynamics associated with a STIRAP-like process, although subject to strong control fields, can be described by perturbative analytical treatments, the validity of which originates from the weak nonadiabaticity rather than weak fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operators U k were evaluated using Eq. (7), and they differ only in the RF amplitudes involved. In NMR spectrometers the frequency and duration of the pulse do not vary as a function of position, and although the absolute phase does, this phase is unobservable here since the same RF coil is used for both transmission and reception.…”
Section: A Incoherent Processes In Nmr Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%