2009
DOI: 10.3109/14038190802294856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Cycles of Breathing Technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest physical therapy on airway clearance in bronchiectasis – A crossover trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcome reporting is not consistent even among studies of similar interventions. For example, the ACBT was investigated in four trials, including two randomised crossover studies [36,68] and two randomised parallel group studies [34,40], but sputum was the only common outcome among them. Using sputum as an outcome is controversial, as some authors argue it is not accurate because patients may swallow or be unwilling to expectorate secretions [86].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome reporting is not consistent even among studies of similar interventions. For example, the ACBT was investigated in four trials, including two randomised crossover studies [36,68] and two randomised parallel group studies [34,40], but sputum was the only common outcome among them. Using sputum as an outcome is controversial, as some authors argue it is not accurate because patients may swallow or be unwilling to expectorate secretions [86].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%