2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/wicom.2010.5601100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Defense Model of Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolutionary game is fundamentally applied for the biological networks in which the players can combine pure and mixed strategies with rational behavior to enhance some population characteristics [ 21 ]. Moreover, different WSNs applications have been modeled using evolutionary game in [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Games Theory For Wsns Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary game is fundamentally applied for the biological networks in which the players can combine pure and mixed strategies with rational behavior to enhance some population characteristics [ 21 ]. Moreover, different WSNs applications have been modeled using evolutionary game in [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Games Theory For Wsns Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-cooperative game theory-based schemes could assist detection schemes in improving their performance as well as efficiency though they are not concerned with detection directly [ 182 ]. Qiu et al [ 15 ] proposed an active defense model for WSN where nodes have limited rationality of evolutionary learning ability based on evolutionary game theory. The nodes can achieve the most effective defense by adjusting their defensive strategies active and dynamic.…”
Section: Applications Of Game Theory In Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-operation between the sensor nodes is essential as they are devoid of a fixed infrastructure and a centralized entity of control (Arun Korath and Vineeth 2011). The sensor nodes need to deliver its co-operation for the other interacting sensor nodes by ignoring its benefits for improving the lifetime of the network (Qiu et al 2010). The limited computational capability, energy and storage potential of sensor nodes induces selfish activity of sensor nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%