2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active disturbance rejection control for uncertain time-delay nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a practical physical system, the external disturbances and their time derivatives are apparently bounded. Therefore, Assumption 2 is also fairly mild and common in the literature on ESO design [40][41][42] and near-space vehicles-related disturbance rejection control [6,11,34]. Assumption 3 can be found in the literature in which output or states are constrained in time-varying sets, and guarantees that the constraints can be achieved [21,25].…”
Section: Assumption 3 There Exist Positive Constants Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a practical physical system, the external disturbances and their time derivatives are apparently bounded. Therefore, Assumption 2 is also fairly mild and common in the literature on ESO design [40][41][42] and near-space vehicles-related disturbance rejection control [6,11,34]. Assumption 3 can be found in the literature in which output or states are constrained in time-varying sets, and guarantees that the constraints can be achieved [21,25].…”
Section: Assumption 3 There Exist Positive Constants Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the smaller parameter ε 1 guarantees that the ESO system works in higher linear gain. In most of the existing literature about disturbance observers, there exists a tradeoff between the fast reconstruction of the states and the steady-state error [40][41][42]. High gain disturbance observers can attenuate the steady-state estimation error due to the modeling uncertainty, but increasing the gain leads to a higher sensitivity to measurement noise.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research on time-delay compensator has also developed rapidly [22][23][24][25], such as the output feedback compensator [22], and the predictor compensator [25]. The existing research primarily focuses on linear ADRC, such as the stability analysis of linear ADRC [26], analysis of ADRC for systems with uncertainty and delay [27], and exponential stability analysis of a closed-loop system [28]. However, few theoretical studies are on nonlinear ADRC systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the problem of the disturbance rejection associated with the systems with input delay is still one of the research focus in control field. In order to improve the disturbance rejection capability in this type of systems, some effective methods had been proposed by Pyrkin et al, 14 Zhang et al, 15 and Ran et al 16 Predictor‐based feedback control was also utilized to reject the external disturbance for the systems with input delay. In the work of Pyrkin et al, 17 the unknown sinusoidal disturbance can be rejected by combining predictor feedback control with an adaptive scheme to identify the frequency of this sinusoidal disturbance signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%