2022
DOI: 10.1049/cth2.12292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active disturbance rejection control for hydraulic systems with full‐state constraints and input saturation

Abstract: Input saturation and disturbances often exist in hydraulic systems, reducing internal state stability and tracking response performances of the system as well as complicating the design of advanced non‐linear controllers. A practical method named active disturbance rejection controller is proposed by backstepping method for full‐state constrained hydraulic systems to constrain tracking errors in the desired boundaries and deal with input saturation as well as disturbances. To achieve the previously mentioned o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of flight control strategies with disturbance resistance and higher efficiency has also received attention. At present, the flight control methods for drones mainly include linear control methods [8][9][10], nonlinear control methods [11][12][13], and intelligent control methods [14][15][16][17]. The learning-based robot control method has received widespread attention in the field of automatic control [18][19][20], as it ignores the dynamic model of the robot and learns control methods through a large amount of motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of flight control strategies with disturbance resistance and higher efficiency has also received attention. At present, the flight control methods for drones mainly include linear control methods [8][9][10], nonlinear control methods [11][12][13], and intelligent control methods [14][15][16][17]. The learning-based robot control method has received widespread attention in the field of automatic control [18][19][20], as it ignores the dynamic model of the robot and learns control methods through a large amount of motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the actual operation, robot manipulators are affected by the uncertainties of the internal dynamic modeling parameters and external disturbances, which decrease the control performance and are not conducive to the accurate and efficient tracking of the desired trajectory. With the development of research, various advanced control strategies such as feedback linearization control [5], PID control [6], model predictive control [7], fuzzy control [8], robust control [9,10], neural network control [11][12][13], active disturbance rejection control [14,15], and sliding mode controller (SMC) [16][17][18] have been widely used in the tracking tasks of robot manipulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the predictive model, the control input was given by calculating the permissible value of future states at every sampling instant. In works [15][16][17][18], barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) for control of nonlinear system with state constraints has been proposed. Combined with the backstepping technique, the BLF-based controller can provide large control action when the state approaches the barriers, pulling the state away from the preset boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%