2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active disturbance rejection for time-varying state-delay systems based on equivalent-input-disturbance approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, an important problem in the stabilization and tracking control is the construction of an appropriate feedback controller for the considered system. In this connection, various control methods such as adaptive control, repetitive control, resilient control, and proportional-integral (PI) control are proposed for different types of dynamical systems in the literature [13][14][15][16]. To be specific, quantized static output feedback tracking control has been designed in Li et al [13] for discrete-time fuzzy-model-based networked control systems under an asynchronous event-triggered mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, an important problem in the stabilization and tracking control is the construction of an appropriate feedback controller for the considered system. In this connection, various control methods such as adaptive control, repetitive control, resilient control, and proportional-integral (PI) control are proposed for different types of dynamical systems in the literature [13][14][15][16]. To be specific, quantized static output feedback tracking control has been designed in Li et al [13] for discrete-time fuzzy-model-based networked control systems under an asynchronous event-triggered mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbance is a common factor that has negative effects on system performance and even creates a pathway for system instability. It is noted that, equivalent input disturbance (EID), 22 extended state observer (ESO), 23 uncertain and disturbance estimator (UDE), 24 disturbance observer, 25 and so on are the disturbance rejection methods addressed in the literatures to estimate the unknown disturbances. In Reference 22, the authors invoked EID approach to attenuate the disturbance impact for time‐varying state‐delay systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that, equivalent input disturbance (EID), 22 extended state observer (ESO), 23 uncertain and disturbance estimator (UDE), 24 disturbance observer, 25 and so on are the disturbance rejection methods addressed in the literatures to estimate the unknown disturbances. In Reference 22, the authors invoked EID approach to attenuate the disturbance impact for time‐varying state‐delay systems. To deal with the effects of disturbance on multi‐agent systems, in Reference 23, the ESO approach is developed and as a result both the disturbance rejection and state estimation are accomplished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 An adaptive neural-network PET control problem for a class of switched nonlinear systems was investigated in the work of Li et al 22 Multisource disturbances widely exist in control systems. There are mainly two kinds of sources, that is, deterministic disturbance (see the works of Li et al 23 and Lou et al 24 ) and stochastic disturbances (see the works of Zong et al 25,26 ). The presence of these disturbances can degrade the system performance, such as unexpected external load variations and noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%