As an alternative to the traditional structural analysis adopting computer-aided modeling and evaluation, this pedagogical research provided an integrated teaching and learning approach by mapping cognitive domains defined in Bloom's Taxonomy Theory in the newly launched course named Woodwork Fabrication and Analysis for second-year students. The course incorporated ancient Chinese woodwork tradition into the integrated learning activities involving engineering graphics, mechanics of materials, hands-on fabrication, and structural modeling/analysis. Aiming to compare the traditional and new courses in terms of their effectiveness in enhancing student learning of structural engineering subjects, both courses were designed to achieve consistent learning outcomes (e.g., to develop structural analysis skills). This study demonstrated student work in engineering drawing and structural analysis reflecting their critical thinking and active learning in the new course. Afterwards, students from both traditional and new courses were surveyed in terms of the overall satisfaction of their selected course, perceptions of the course effectiveness in enhancing civil engineering-related skills, and expectations of the course to their further study and work. With the student sample from the traditional course as the control group, the comparative study revealed that the integrated teaching and learning approach in the new course could lead to students' higher overall satisfaction and more positive perceptions of the course effectiveness in enhancing structural analysis-related skills. This pedagogical study would serve as a reference for other civil engineering educators in adopting integrated teaching and learning in lower-years' undergraduate education.