2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9304303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active exploration in adaptive model predictive control

Abstract: A dual adaptive model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is presented for linear, time-invariant systems subject to bounded disturbances and parametric uncertainty in the state-space matrices. Online set-membership identification is performed to reduce the uncertainty and thus control affects both the informativity of identification and the system's performance. The main contribution of the paper is to include this dual effect in the MPC optimization problem using a predicted worst-case cost in the objective f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we use a similar approach to that followed in [28] and impose terminal constraints to make sure that X N |k lies inside an invariant set. As the controller in [28] is designed to perform regulation, the center z N |k was set as the origin and α N |k is bounded by a precomputed constant ᾱ. However, a different strategy must be employed for reference tracking to account for the uncertainty in the input setpoint.…”
Section: Terminal Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we use a similar approach to that followed in [28] and impose terminal constraints to make sure that X N |k lies inside an invariant set. As the controller in [28] is designed to perform regulation, the center z N |k was set as the origin and α N |k is bounded by a precomputed constant ᾱ. However, a different strategy must be employed for reference tracking to account for the uncertainty in the input setpoint.…”
Section: Terminal Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], we proposed an extension to [22] which introduces dual actions in AMPC by means of a predicted state tube while guaranteeing constraint satisfaction. The problem considered was again only a regulation one, and was implicitly framed in an infinite horizon setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , Λ j N −1|k } v1 j=1 needed for nominal tube containment (13), which is expressed by constraints (24h), (24i), and (24j). The cost function expectation (24a) is taken with respect to a predicted noise sequence…”
Section: Assumption 2 (Terminal Set For Nominal Tube) There Exists a ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, early results have considered a state and input dependent term [3], [4], or alternatively stochastic multiplicative and additive disturbances [5]- [7]. Under the same assumptions, recent efforts have been made to improve control performance by including model learning [8]- [10], or parameter adaptation [11], [12], and dual actions [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive MPC (AMPC) is a technique which ensures robustness while updating the uncertainty using online identification (e.g. see [2], [3], [4]). In AMPC, uncertainty is captured by a parameteric state space model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%