2022
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.6484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active fault‐tolerant control based on sparse recovery diagnosis: The twin wind turbines case

Abstract: This article deals with the design of an active fault‐tolerant control (AFTC) for a twin wind turbine consisting of two wind turbines mounted on the same tower. When one of the turbines is impacted by electrical faults, precisely a stator inter‐turn short circuits fault or a demagnetization fault, the sparse recovery diagnosis method is used for the detection, isolation and estimation of the active fault. An AFTC law is designed for the supervision of the faulty machine. Both methods, concerning diagnosis and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Makni, Haidar, Barbot, and Plestan 19 design an active fault–tolerant control for a twin wind turbine consisting of two wind turbines mounted on the same tower. A sparse recovery diagnosis method is used to detect, isolate and estimate possible turbine electrical faults, stator inter–turn short circuits faults, or demagnetization faults; while a fault–tolerant control law deals with the supervision of the faulty machine.…”
Section: The Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Makni, Haidar, Barbot, and Plestan 19 design an active fault–tolerant control for a twin wind turbine consisting of two wind turbines mounted on the same tower. A sparse recovery diagnosis method is used to detect, isolate and estimate possible turbine electrical faults, stator inter–turn short circuits faults, or demagnetization faults; while a fault–tolerant control law deals with the supervision of the faulty machine.…”
Section: The Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%