Active Flow Control for an Outer Wing Model of a Take-off Transport Aircraft Configuration - A Numerical Study

Ciobaca, Vlad; Wild, Jochen

doi:10.2514/6.2014-2403

Cited by 16 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They are therefore prown to early separation onset in low speed conditions. In the national funded project MOVE.ON, such a wingtip with installed AFC at the leading edge to prevent early wing tip stall was investigated in detail by numerical simulations [32] and experiments [33]. The investigated geometry is reduced to the very outboard part of a modern transport aircraft wing, but still including the last portion of the slat device.…”

Section: Afc At Curved Wingtipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics

Wild¹

2016

CEAS Aeronaut J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-lift systems are matured, robust and reliable components of a transport aircraft. Although facing nearly 100 years of history, there is an ongoing need of research in the aerodynamics of such systems due to changes in the requirements for aircraft development. Other than in former times, high-lift aerodynamics research is nowadays more incorporated into larger projects. It is therefore not as visible as before when dedicated high-lift projects were conducted, as e.g. the EC funded project EUROLIFT. The aim of this summary is to collect from different projects the current challenging research topics in the area of highlift aerodynamics. The contribution gives an overview on recent research topics addressed at the German DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology in collaboration with national and international partners.

show abstract

Section: Afc At Curved Wingtipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics

Wild¹

2016

CEAS Aeronaut J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Its design is based on experience from numerical and experimental studies on a similar geometry [17,18]. A total of 28 rectangular slots are integrated parallel to the leading edge at x/c re f ≈ 5% on the suction-side surface.…”

Section: Active Flow Control Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wing Tip Drag Reduction at Nominal Take-Off Mach Number: An Approach to Local Active Flow Control with a Highly Robust Actuator System

Bauer¹,

Grund

Nitsche

et al. 2016

Aerospace

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses wind tunnel test results aimed at advancing active flow control technology to increase the aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft during take-off. A model of the outer section of a representative civil airliner wing was equipped with two-stage fluidic actuators between the slat edge and wing tip, where mechanical high-lift devices fail to integrate. The experiments were conducted at a nominal take-off Mach number of M = 0.2. At this incidence velocity, separation on the wing section, accompanied by increased drag, is triggered by the strong slat edge vortex at high angles of attack. On the basis of global force measurements and local static pressure data, the effect of pulsed blowing on the complex flow is evaluated, considering various momentum coefficients and spanwise distributions of the actuation effort. It is shown that through local intensification of forcing, a momentum coefficient of less than c µ = 0.6% suffices to offset the stall by 2.4 • , increase the maximum lift by more than 10% and reduce the drag by 37% compared to the uncontrolled flow.

show abstract

“…The application of the active flow control (AFC) technology can remedy this problem and allow more aggressive wing tip designs. The AFC has been successfully used by Fricke et al (2016) and Ciobaca et al (2011) to remedy the problem of flow separation and by Ciobaca and Wild (2014) for classical blended winglet.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical studies of active flow control on wing tip extension

Vrchota¹,

Prachař²,

Peng

et al. 2019

AEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In the European project AFLoNext, active flow control (AFC) measures were adopted in the wing tip extension leading edge to suppress flow separation. It is expected that the designed wing tip extension may improve aerodynamic efficiency by about 2 per cent in terms of fuel consumption and emissions. As the leading edge of the wing tip is not protected with high-lift device, flow separation occurs earlier than over the inboard wing in the take-off/landing configuration. The aim of this study is the adoption of AFC to delay wing tip stall and to improve lift-to-drag ratio. Design/methodology/approach Several actuator locations and AFC strategies were tested with computational fluid dynamics. The first approach was “standard” one with physical modeling of the actuators, and the second one was focused on the volume forcing method. The actuators location and the forcing plane close to separation line of the reference configuration were chose to enhance the flow with steady and pulsed jet blowing. Dependence of the lift-to-drag benefit with respect to injected mass flow is investigated. Findings The mechanism of flow separation onset is identified as the interaction of slat-end and wing tip vortices. These vortices moving toward each other with increasing angle of attack (AoA) interact and cause the flow separation. AFC is applied to control the slat-end vortex and the inboard movement of the wing tip vortex to suppress their interaction. The separation onset has been postponed by about 2° of AoA; the value of ift-to-drag (L/D) was improved up to 22 per cent for the most beneficial cases. Practical implications The AFC using the steady or pulsed blowing (PB) was proved to be an effective tool for delaying the flow separation. Although better values of L/D have been reached using steady blowing, it is also shown that PB case with a duty cycle of 0.5 needs only one half of the mass flow. Originality/value Two approaches of different levels of complexity are studied and compared. The first is based on physical modeling of actuator cavities, while the second relies on volume forcing method which does not require detailed actuator modeling. Both approaches give consistent results.

show abstract

Active Flow Control for an Outer Wing Model of a Take-off Transport Aircraft Configuration - A Numerical Study

Cited by 16 publications

References 12 publications

Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics

Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics

Wing Tip Drag Reduction at Nominal Take-Off Mach Number: An Approach to Local Active Flow Control with a Highly Robust Actuator System

Numerical studies of active flow control on wing tip extension

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About