1992
DOI: 10.1101/gad.6.2.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active genes in budding yeast display enhanced in vivo accessibility to foreign DNA methylases: a novel in vivo probe for chromatin structure of yeast.

Abstract: Unlike higher eukaryotes, where an inverse correlation has been generally observed between gene expression and methylation of CpG sites, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks DNA methylation. Gene regulatory mechanisms can function independently of DNA methylation in yeast, and yeast strains expressing foreign DNA methylases that modify adenine and CpG residues have been found to be viable. We have used such strains to determine whether the transcriptional status of genes can influence the level of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
132
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This characteristic together with the compact organization of the genome suggests that yeast gene regulation has evolved efficient mechanisms for insulating genes from each other. Some sequences named STAR (subtelomeric antisilencing region) are able to counteract silencer-driven repression at the matingtype HML locus and act with antisilencing properties against the spreading of silenced chromatin (Singh and Klar, 1992;Fourel et al, 1999Fourel et al, , 2001.…”
Section: Partition Of Distinct Chromosomal Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic together with the compact organization of the genome suggests that yeast gene regulation has evolved efficient mechanisms for insulating genes from each other. Some sequences named STAR (subtelomeric antisilencing region) are able to counteract silencer-driven repression at the matingtype HML locus and act with antisilencing properties against the spreading of silenced chromatin (Singh and Klar, 1992;Fourel et al, 1999Fourel et al, , 2001.…”
Section: Partition Of Distinct Chromosomal Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sir2⌬ mutant strain exhibits complete derepression at these loci. Derepression has been correlated with increased accessibility to DNA-modifying enzymes and psoralen, indicating that these loci have a more relaxed chromatin structure in the absence of Sir2p (Nasmyth, 1982;Gottschling, 1992;Singh and Klar, 1992;Loo and Rine, 1994;Fritze and Esposito, 1997;Smith and Boeke, 1997;Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few techniques are capable of demonstrating these interactions in the context of native chromatin in living cells, and these methods have limitations (1). For example, with footprinting techniques, protection against chemical (e.g., dimethyl sulfate) or enzymatic probes expressed in cells, e.g., DNA methyltransferases (MTases) (2)(3)(4)(5)(6) or DNase I (7), requires close proximity of the interacting factor to DNA sites that are modified or cleaved by the footprinting agent. Footprinting methods also require that the factor resists displacement by the enzymatic or chemical probe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%