2010
DOI: 10.1167/9.8.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active ignoring in early visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining connections can be considered as the pass zone or the spotlight of attentional focus, while the pruned connections form the suppressive surround. Neurally, the sources of top-down attentional signals are hypothesized to be a network of frontoparietal regions (Zanto & Rissman, 2015), including the frontal eye fields (Couperus & Mangun, 2010;Seiss, Driver, & Eimer, 2009), inferior frontal junction (Sylvester, Jack, Corbetta, & Shulman, 2008), superior frontal and angular gyri (Ruff & Driver, 2006), and precuneus (Payne & Allen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining connections can be considered as the pass zone or the spotlight of attentional focus, while the pruned connections form the suppressive surround. Neurally, the sources of top-down attentional signals are hypothesized to be a network of frontoparietal regions (Zanto & Rissman, 2015), including the frontal eye fields (Couperus & Mangun, 2010;Seiss, Driver, & Eimer, 2009), inferior frontal junction (Sylvester, Jack, Corbetta, & Shulman, 2008), superior frontal and angular gyri (Ruff & Driver, 2006), and precuneus (Payne & Allen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The visual areas of the cuneal cortex are associated with direction visual attention to salient stimuli (Payne and Allen ). The putamen has been found to be particularly activated in response to changes in uncertainty levels in gambling tasks (Vilares et al .…”
Section: Differences Between Skewed and Unskewed Gamblesmentioning
confidence: 99%