1996
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(96)00005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active intraplate deformation in south India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for two such upwarps began to accumulate in the 1980s and 1990s, the first of them running east from Cochin (I on figure 5) [52] and the second between Mangalore and Madras (II). Along the latter there was evidence for a thin crust and anomalously positive values for gravity, both of them consistent with extension and the presence of mantle rocks relatively close to the surface, microseismicity associated with pervasive rock fracturing, and above all the displacement of river channels away from the proposed axis of uplift [34].…”
Section: Phil Trans R Soc a (2012)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Evidence for two such upwarps began to accumulate in the 1980s and 1990s, the first of them running east from Cochin (I on figure 5) [52] and the second between Mangalore and Madras (II). Along the latter there was evidence for a thin crust and anomalously positive values for gravity, both of them consistent with extension and the presence of mantle rocks relatively close to the surface, microseismicity associated with pervasive rock fracturing, and above all the displacement of river channels away from the proposed axis of uplift [34].…”
Section: Phil Trans R Soc a (2012)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As per IS 1893 (BIS 2002), seismic study area falls in the upgraded zones II and III in the seismic zonation map of India. Srinivasan and Sreenivas (1977), Valdiya (1998), Purnachandra Rao (1999), Ramalingeswara Rao (2000), Subrahmanya (1996Subrahmanya ( , 2002, Ganesha Raj (2001), Sridevi Jade (2004), Ganesha Raj and Nijagunappa (2004), Sitharam et al (2006) and Sitharam and Anbazhagan (2007) highlight that seismic activity in the peninsular India has increased when compared to the past. Reddy (2003) highlighted that the south Indian seismicity is neither understood properly nor given importance since it is of micro-dimensions.…”
Section: Seismicity Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ramalingeswara Rao (2000) carried out strain rate and heat flow study in the southern India and characterized as medium to low seismicity region. Subrahmanya (2002 and1996) highlights that the entire study area becoming seismically active due to the upwarping of Mulki-Pulicat Lake (MPL) axis which connects 13 • N in west to 13.4 • N in east. He concludes that there is lot seismic activity around this Mulki-Pulicat Lake axis and in particular he highlights that micro to meso-seimicity to the south and mega seismicity to the north of the MLP axis.…”
Section: Study Area and Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%