Active Learning in College Science 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Learning and Conceptual Understanding in Biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution: By intentionally choosing active learning activities and tools that support the learning outcomes of the course, instructors can promote deep engagement and maximize effectiveness (Olimpo & Esparza, 2020; Prince, 2004). This approach uses the technology to enhance teaching instead of teaching to the technology, and is further facilitated by conducting a cost‐benefit analysis.…”
Section: Designing Better Online Courses: Integrating Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution: By intentionally choosing active learning activities and tools that support the learning outcomes of the course, instructors can promote deep engagement and maximize effectiveness (Olimpo & Esparza, 2020; Prince, 2004). This approach uses the technology to enhance teaching instead of teaching to the technology, and is further facilitated by conducting a cost‐benefit analysis.…”
Section: Designing Better Online Courses: Integrating Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution: By intentionally choosing active learning activities and tools that support the learning outcomes of the course instructors can promote deep engagement and maximize effectiveness (Prince, 2004;Olimpo and Esparza, 2020). This approach uses the technology to enhance teaching instead of teaching to the technology and is further facilitated by conducting a cost-benefit analysis.…”
Section: Integrating Active Learning Online: Challenges and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National science education reports have continued to call for the incorporation of evidence-based teaching strategies-such as active learning-into the K-16 curriculum [National Research Council, 2012;Next-generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States, 2013]. Active learning increases students' conceptual understanding in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses whilst decreasing the achievement gap between minoritized students and their nonminoritized peers (Freeman et al, 2014;Olimpo and Esparza, 2020;Theobald et al, 2020). Despite the benefits of using teaching practices that support active learning, instructors cite prominent obstacles to its implementation such as large class sizes, time constraints, and overall uncertainty attributed to the looselystructured nature of student-centered instruction (Henderson and Dancy, 2011;Hains and Smith, 2012;Zagallo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%