2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active learning and molecular dynamics simulations to find high melting temperature alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It evaluates how much the prediction may change if a similar model had been trained on a different dataset. This measure was used for AL for example in [6] which propose a method to predict alloys melting points. It is expressed as :…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It evaluates how much the prediction may change if a similar model had been trained on a different dataset. This measure was used for AL for example in [6] which propose a method to predict alloys melting points. It is expressed as :…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational T m prediction has been demonstrated using various approaches (e.g., hysteresis, [17][18][19] two-phase coexistence, 20,21 interface pinning, 22,23 and other methods [24][25][26][27][28] ) and has been actively explored for decades. 24,25,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The two-phase coexistence (TPC) approach employing large supercells (>10 000 atoms) is considered the "gold standard" for predicting T m, as this approach relies on very few assumptions. 37 However, accurate computational predictions based on rst-principles methods, which are accurate and generally predictive, are prohibitively computationally expensive as ensuing calculations are "large" in two domains: the number of atoms in the simulation cell and the length of simulation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the uncertainty estimates are often associated with candidate materials outside the training space, improved model predictions may be found by iteratively sampling candidates that show either desired values of the target property or high uncertainty, and then retraining the surrogate model with these candidates included in the training data. Such an "active learning" workflow has been demonstrated to work well for the discovery of Ir-oxides 21 , transition metal complexes 22 , intermetallics 23 , transition metal dichalcogenides 24 , solid-state electrolytes 25 , and high melting temperature alloys 26 , among many others. In each of these cases, the active learning workflow is geared towards the optimization of a particular target property of interest along with improvement in model predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%