2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7798967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active learning based requirement mining for cyber-physical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 4: For any ρ ∈ (0, 1), if λ t = 2B + 300γ t log 3 (t/ρ), where γ t is the maximum information gain defined in [29], then…”
Section: Theoretical Results Regarding the Effectiveness Of Our Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lemma 4: For any ρ ∈ (0, 1), if λ t = 2B + 300γ t log 3 (t/ρ), where γ t is the maximum information gain defined in [29], then…”
Section: Theoretical Results Regarding the Effectiveness Of Our Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…holds with probability > 1 − ρ. Proof: The lemma can be proved by following similar steps as the proof of Lemma 2 in [29].…”
Section: Theoretical Results Regarding the Effectiveness Of Our Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we follow the workflow in Algorithm 1, deriving the cost function f ϕ in it from a Bayesian network. For the optimization step (Line 3 of Algorithm 1) we use Gaussian process optimizationwe follow [4,9,10] about this choice. It has a feature that it suggests the global shape of an unknown function; this feature turns out to be convenient for our purpose of integrating causal information in falsification.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier version of this paper [18] appeared in the 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). This paper significantly extends that paper by (i) solving a formal interpretation problem rather than a requirement mining problem, (ii) removing the assumption that the hyper-parameters of the underlying Gaussian process (GP) are known a priori, (iii) providing detailed proofs of theoretical results, and (iv) offering a detailed case study that is closer to real practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%