Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Learning for Multi-relational Data Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods in this literature can be divided into two general categories. One category is the conventional active learning framework where an algorithm selects unlabeled data points and human intelligence is employed to label this selected point [13,24,31,44,49]. The other category consists of methods that rely more on human intelligence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods in this literature can be divided into two general categories. One category is the conventional active learning framework where an algorithm selects unlabeled data points and human intelligence is employed to label this selected point [13,24,31,44,49]. The other category consists of methods that rely more on human intelligence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, RedThread is also related to measuring proximity in graphs [38], to build the k nearest neighbor structure to search over [12], and various graph extraction techniques [10,14,26] and relational data knowledge base extraction methods [16,35,36]. These problem settings however differ from ours as RedThread focuses on a local active setting targeted at finding related entities.…”
Section: Active Search Exploration and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental settings: We compare the Thompson sampling models with Amdc models, and Prescal for passive learning. Amdc model has been proposed to achieve two different active learning goals, constructing a predictive model and maximising the valid triples in a knowledge base, with two different querying strategies [10]. Amdc-pred is a predictive model construction strategy and chooses a triple which is the most ambiguous (close to the decision boundary) at each time t. Amdc-pop is a population strategy which aims to maximise the number of valid triples in a knowledge base, choosing a triple with the highest expected value at each time.…”
Section: Knowledge Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original Amdc [10], Amdc-pop model obtains more valid triples than Amdc-pred, and Amdc-pred shows high ROC-AUC scores than Amdc-pop. In our experiment, however, Amdc-pop shows comparable cumulative gain to Amdcpred and even worse than Amdc-pred for the UMLS.…”
Section: Knowledge Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation