2016 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cluster.2016.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Learning in Performance Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More information on this method is available in [27]. The use of GP for modeling software performance has been proposed in [14]. We also use GP here for verification on our datasets.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More information on this method is available in [27]. The use of GP for modeling software performance has been proposed in [14]. We also use GP here for verification on our datasets.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sumo [16] Generic ++ The authors in [14] recommend the use of Gaussian Processes (GP) as a flexible method to both model performance and choose the next configurations to sample. Our tests show however that the trends witnessed in VNF profiling are not efficiently captured by GPs.…”
Section: Sampling Heuristic Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online data analysis and reduction co-design is complicated by a much larger configuration space than is found in many conventional application design problems. In the case of a single application, the number of configurable parameters is often small, and thus, we can identify good values for configuration parameters via a mix of performance modeling and experiments (Foster 1994; Hoefler et al, 2011; Duplyakin et al, 2016; Balaprakash et al, 2018). In contrast, consider an ODAR code that couples one or more simulation, analysis, and reduction applications.…”
Section: Odar Co-design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches combine traditional modeling techniques with methods from machine learning, including active and transfer learning, neural networks or decision trees, to further improve the robustness of their predictions [32]. Duplyakin et al, for example, apply active learning to suggest followup experiments that can help refine their initial performance models created by Gaussian process regression [33]. We, in contrast, employ reinforcement learning to derive a parameter value selection heuristic that is efficient for all kinds of HPC applications, not tuned for one specific application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%