2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12187806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Power Loss Reduction for Radial Distribution Systems by Placing Capacitors and PV Systems with Geography Location Constraints

Abstract: This paper presents a highly effective method of installing both capacitors and PV systems in distribution systems for the purpose of reducing total power loss in branches. Three study cases with the installation of one capacitor, two capacitors and three capacitors were implemented and then the optimal solutions were used to install one more photovoltaic (PV) system. One PV system with 20% active power of all loads and less than active power of all loads was tested for two different conditions: (1) with geogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Q cj is the reactive power generation of the jth capacitor and Q c,max is the maximum reactive power generated by all capacitors. As demonstrated in [62], the maximum compensated power of capacitors could not be higher than the total reactive power of all loads because the redundant reactive power will continue to flow into other nodes where reactive power is necessary. e active power flows will cause power loss unintentionally.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Q cj is the reactive power generation of the jth capacitor and Q c,max is the maximum reactive power generated by all capacitors. As demonstrated in [62], the maximum compensated power of capacitors could not be higher than the total reactive power of all loads because the redundant reactive power will continue to flow into other nodes where reactive power is necessary. e active power flows will cause power loss unintentionally.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitness function must be calculated to reflect the quality of solutions. In the problem, fitness function is the sum of objective function and penalty terms, in which objective function (obj) can be either TPL in equation (1) or TC in equation 2, whereas the penalty terms are always the penalty of the violation of the branch current and penalty of the violation of node voltage [62].…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional power system enables the energy flow at the longer electrical distance leading to excessive power losses. About 13 % of the losses in electrical power system occur at distribution systems [1]. A considerable contributing factor in these losses is the excessive reactive power demand at the distribution level, which negatively impacts the voltage profile of the system [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar to [35], a new pathfinder algorithm (PFA) is proposed for obtaining simultaneous optimal network reconfiguration and DG allocation. Similarly, hybrid genetic particle swarm optimization (HGPSO) [36], stochastic fractal search optimization algorithm (SFSOA) [37] and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) [38] are some of such recent meta-heuristic approaches for solving optimal allocation of DGs problem considering technical aspects. Further, the reader can also find recent reviews on distribution system performance improvement via optimal allocation of DGs, CBs and network reconfiguration and their combination [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%