2003
DOI: 10.1207/s1532706xid0304_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Remembering, Selective Forgetting, and Collective Identity: The Case of Bloody Sunday

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Historical memories are part of everyone's education (not to be confused with schooling) and are gained through participation in formal and daily activities. What gets defined as the ''official'' memory, therefore, reflects the power of certain groups and ideologies in society to define the past according to their interests, often by silencing alternative and competing memory discourses (Conway 2003;Epstein 2001). This is particularly obvious in historical narratives taught in schools when such narratives provide a framework through which children make sense of and lay claim to a national collective memory (Davies 2004;Siegel 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical memories are part of everyone's education (not to be confused with schooling) and are gained through participation in formal and daily activities. What gets defined as the ''official'' memory, therefore, reflects the power of certain groups and ideologies in society to define the past according to their interests, often by silencing alternative and competing memory discourses (Conway 2003;Epstein 2001). This is particularly obvious in historical narratives taught in schools when such narratives provide a framework through which children make sense of and lay claim to a national collective memory (Davies 2004;Siegel 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between memory and identity raises two important issues: first, it highlights the political and emotional value of collective memories because past representations are preserved through social and ideological practices such as commemoration sites and rituals; second, the connection between memory and identity suggests that memory is created in interaction between and among people in social and political contexts (Conway 2003;Middleton and Edwards 1990;Olick 1999;Zerubavel 1996). Developments in social psychology over the last several decades show how social identity processes are crucial not only in maintaining positive social identity (Tajfel and Turner 1986;Turner 1999), but also in undertaking collective action to subvert hegemonic societal mechanisms and structures (van Zomeren et al 2008).…”
Section: Dangerous Memories and Conflict Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, what gets defined as 'official' memory reflects the power of certain groups and ideologies in society to define the past according to their interests, often by silencing alternative and competing memory discourses (Conway 2003;Epstein 2001;Middleton and Edwards 1990). Efforts to change these representations-e.g.…”
Section: Dangerous Memories and Conflict Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special form of "reconstructed" memories (known as folk memories, which often differ from the dominant discourse of the powerful outgroup), hold an especially meaningful role in maintaining cultural identity amongst stigmatized ethnic groups (Conway, 2003).…”
Section: The Role Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%