2009
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2008.917091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active RFID System With Spread-Spectrum Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal S-ALOHA and EBFSA are adopted for comparisons, i.e., the reader is assumed to know the exact tag number. CDMA based schemes are expected to separate tag collisions [10]. We include CDMA-ALOHA RFID identification in Figure 3, where each tag randomly selects a Walsh code to spread its data and randomly selects a slot to send the spread data.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ideal S-ALOHA and EBFSA are adopted for comparisons, i.e., the reader is assumed to know the exact tag number. CDMA based schemes are expected to separate tag collisions [10]. We include CDMA-ALOHA RFID identification in Figure 3, where each tag randomly selects a Walsh code to spread its data and randomly selects a slot to send the spread data.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delay of the most widely adopted schemes, tree splitting and S-ALOHA [1,6] and their improved versions [10] are about 2N to 3N slots. Compared with them, as long as K < 2N, Ogrid is more efficient.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these signals conflict with signals from other sensors because action RFID tags cannot cooperate with other sensors [7]. The application of spread spectrum communication to active tags has been proposed in order to address this problem [8]. Spread spectrum communication is known to be resistant to interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%