2023
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202311654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Sites Decorated Nonpolar Pore‐Based MOF for One‐step Acquisition of C2H4 and Recovery of C3H6

Gang‐Ding Wang,
Yong‐Zhi Li,
Wen‐Juan Shi
et al.

Abstract: Herein, a 2‐fold interpenetrated metal‐organic framework (MOF) Zn‐BPZ‐TATB with accessible N/O active sites in nonpolar pore surfaces was reported for one‐step C2H4 purification from C2H6 or C3H6 mixtures as well as recovery of C3H6 from C2H6/C3H6/C2H4 mixtures. The MOF exhibits the favorable C2H6 and C3H6 uptakes (> 100 cm3 g‐1 at 298 K under 100 kPa) as well as selective adsorption of C2H6 and C3H6 over C2H4. The C3H6‐ and C2H6‐selective feature were investigated detailedly by experimental tests as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an excellent match between the experimental and simulated breakthrough curves (Figure S4). The calculated C 2 H 4 productivity is 5.7 mol kg –1 , which is the highest value and superior to that of all promising porous materials for C 2 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation to date, such as Zn 2 (oba) 2 (dmimpym) (1.6 mol kg –1 ), Mn-dtzip (1.2 mol kg –1 ), Zn-BPZ-SA (1.0 mol kg –1 ), and Zn-BPZ-TATB (4.5 mol kg –1 ) (see Table S2). In addition, after five cycling experiments, or exposing HOF-NBDA to the atmosphere for five weeks, no obvious changes in retention time were observed (see Figure a, as well as Figure S5), simultaneously indicating that HOF-NBDA performs good reusability for C 2 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is an excellent match between the experimental and simulated breakthrough curves (Figure S4). The calculated C 2 H 4 productivity is 5.7 mol kg –1 , which is the highest value and superior to that of all promising porous materials for C 2 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation to date, such as Zn 2 (oba) 2 (dmimpym) (1.6 mol kg –1 ), Mn-dtzip (1.2 mol kg –1 ), Zn-BPZ-SA (1.0 mol kg –1 ), and Zn-BPZ-TATB (4.5 mol kg –1 ) (see Table S2). In addition, after five cycling experiments, or exposing HOF-NBDA to the atmosphere for five weeks, no obvious changes in retention time were observed (see Figure a, as well as Figure S5), simultaneously indicating that HOF-NBDA performs good reusability for C 2 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…54 In the field of gas separation, MOFs have exhibited superior performance, surpassing most other porous materials. For instance, numerous MOFs have been documented for their efficacy in purifying C 2 H 4 , 55–59 C 3 H 6 , 60–64 xylene, 65–69 as well as capturing carbon dioxide, 70–74 toxic gases 54,75–78 and so on, 79–84 showcasing high selectivity and uptake capacity. Additionally, MOFs are making strides towards commercialization and practical implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In daily industrial productions, extractive distillation and catalytic hydrogenation are two common methods used to separate C 2 H 4 and C 3 H 6 , but these two methods are energy intensive and have security risks. 10,11 Compared with traditional separation techniques, adsorption separation can be carried out at room temperature with low energy consumption and high efficiency. 12 As a new kind of porous material, metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) are connected by metal nodes and organic connectors through coordination bonds and have a high specific surface area, high porosity, adjustable pore size, and controllable function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the separation of C 2 H 4 and C 3 H 6 remains a great challenge due to the similarity of their physical properties. In daily industrial productions, extractive distillation and catalytic hydrogenation are two common methods used to separate C 2 H 4 and C 3 H 6 , but these two methods are energy intensive and have security risks. , Compared with traditional separation techniques, adsorption separation can be carried out at room temperature with low energy consumption and high efficiency …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%