58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-0507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Subspaces of Airfoil Shape Parameterizations

Abstract: Design and optimization benefit from understanding the dependence of a quantity of interest (e.g., a design objective or constraint function) on the design variables. A low-dimensional active subspace, when present, identifies important directions in the space of design variables; perturbing a design along the active subspace associated with a particular quantity of interest changes that quantity more, on average, than perturbing the design orthogonally to the active subspace. This low-dimensional structure pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CST method (and other explicit basis representations) often couples linear scaling of the shape (affine deformations) and undulating perturbations. Affine deformations-like changes in thickness, camber, and orientation-are often constrained in design problems (e.g., changes in thickness, Reynolds number, or angle-of-attack) and result in relatively well-understood physical impacts on aerodynamic performance; while undulating perturbations are of increasing interest to airfoil design (Berguin et al, 2015;Glaws, Hokanson, et al, 2022;Grey & Constantine, 2018). G2Aero decouples linear scaling and undulations by defining undulations as the set of all deformations modulo linear scaling of discrete curves.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CST method (and other explicit basis representations) often couples linear scaling of the shape (affine deformations) and undulating perturbations. Affine deformations-like changes in thickness, camber, and orientation-are often constrained in design problems (e.g., changes in thickness, Reynolds number, or angle-of-attack) and result in relatively well-understood physical impacts on aerodynamic performance; while undulating perturbations are of increasing interest to airfoil design (Berguin et al, 2015;Glaws, Hokanson, et al, 2022;Grey & Constantine, 2018). G2Aero decouples linear scaling and undulations by defining undulations as the set of all deformations modulo linear scaling of discrete curves.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms made an airfoil design a growing area of research once again. Shape representations that better regularize deformations and reduce the dimension of the design space can have a significant impact in AI and ML applications (Chen et al, 2020;Glaws, Hokanson, et al, 2022;Grey & Constantine, 2018).…”
Section: Statement Of Needmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian ridge functions (posterior mean). Succinctly stated, a Gaussian ridge function is the posterior mean of the Gaussian process in (21), written as (24) ḡ (u) = k u, Û β.…”
Section: Connections Between Ridge Subspaces and Active Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across both paradigms, techniques and ideas within subspace-based dimension reduction have proven to be extremely fruitful in inference. Application areas that have benefitted from subspace-based dimension reduction range from airfoil aerodynamics [21] and combustion [28] to economic forecasting (see page 4403 in [2]), turbomachinery aerothermodynamics [35], solar energy [10] and epidemiology [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%