Active Traffic Control for Oversaturated Intersection Group in Emergency Evacuation

Huang, Zhengfeng; Ren, Gang; Chao, Fan

doi:10.1061/9780784412442.093

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature on improving intersection performance for emergency evacuation conditions can be divided into two general categories: conventional and unconventional signal control. Conventional signal control strategies attempt to optimize a single traffic signal (7,8), a corridor of signals (9,10), or a network of signals (11)(12)(13) to meet the demand generated by the evacuation. Unconventional signal control strategies attempt to improve the intersection performance by stepping outside the constraints of a traditional traffic controller.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research on conventional signal control strategies for emergency evacuations has primarily focused on optimizing an objective function, such as clearance time, delay, percent evacuated, and others (7)(8)(9)(10). Additional research has been done on multiobjective heuristics, which search for an optimum combined vehicle routing and signal timing plan (11)(12)(13).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Unconventional Intersection Control Strategies for Urban Evacuation

Parr

Wolshon

Murray‐Tuite

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intersections form one of the biggest challenges to emergency managers when evacuation plans are developed in urban areas. Signalized intersections reduce the directional capacity of a roadway because they must allocate the right-of-way between competing movements and approaches. In response to this problem, a variety of unconventional intersection control strategies have been developed for implementation during evacuations. Three of the most common are manual traffic control (MTC), flashing yellow signals, and crossing elimination. Fundamentally, each of these strategies has demonstrated strengths and weaknesses, but little work has been done to evaluate them systematically in an apples-to-apples comparison. The goal of this study was to determine which unconventional intersection control strategy was best suited for a given urban evacuation scenario. With results generated by the microscopic traffic simulation software VISSIM 7.0, a dynamic program identified the optimum control strategy for various evacuation scenarios. One general finding of this research was that MTC was best suited for intersections immediately upstream of a bottleneck or for closely spaced, uncoordinated signals. Flashing yellow signals appeared to work well for intersections with high, unbalanced demand and low volumes on the minor approach. Crossing elimination strategies worked best when demand from nonconflicting directions was high and all other approach volumes were relatively low. In practice, these control strategies can be used in combination with other evacuation techniques such as zone phasing and contraflow to utilize network capacity better and to decrease clearance time.

show abstract