2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2017.2690146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Virtual Ground— Single-Phase Transformerless Grid-Connected Voltage Source Inverter Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected topologies are compared in terms of switching voltage stress, switching current stress, volume of inductor, voltage conversion ratio, components count, and size of the converter and summarized in Table 2. The proposed inverter uses the least component counts compared with other related topologies presented in Table 2 30,39–42 . This intern makes the proposed inverter cost‐effective and more reliable.…”
Section: Derivation Of a Family Of Two Winding Semi‐mcis Invertersmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected topologies are compared in terms of switching voltage stress, switching current stress, volume of inductor, voltage conversion ratio, components count, and size of the converter and summarized in Table 2. The proposed inverter uses the least component counts compared with other related topologies presented in Table 2 30,39–42 . This intern makes the proposed inverter cost‐effective and more reliable.…”
Section: Derivation Of a Family Of Two Winding Semi‐mcis Invertersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The HERIC and NPC converters 40,41 suffer from high conduction losses due to more switches 44–46 . In addition, the shoot‐through risk and high components count are the common limitations associated with the H‐5, HERIC, NPC, and AVG inverters 39–42 …”
Section: Derivation Of a Family Of Two Winding Semi‐mcis Invertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Nevertheless, common mode leakage current (CMLC) exists in the nonisolated PV grid-connected inverters, which causes personal safety problem, induces electromagnetic interference, increases inverter losses, and decreases grid current quality. [2][3][4][5] In order to List of Symbols and Abbreviations: i g , Grid current; U in , Input voltage; u g , Grid voltage; i L1 -i L3 , Currents through L 1 -L 3 , respectively; I refm , Maximum value of the reference grid current; U inf , Feedback voltage of U in ; u gf , Feedback voltage of u g ; iL1_ref, Reference current of L 1 ; i L1f , Feedback current of L 1 ; iL2_ref, Reference current of L2; iL2f, Feedback current of L2; φg, Phase of u g ; pin, Instantaneous input power; po, Instantaneous output power; U g , Root-mean-square (RMS) value of u g ; u ds1 -u ds4 , Drain-source voltages of S 1 -S 4 , respectively; u d1 and u d2 , Voltages across D 1 and D 2 , respectively; uC, Voltage across capacitor C; d 2 , Duty ratio of S 2 ; d 1 , Duty ratio of S 1 ; P o , Output power; f s , Switching frequency; U gp , Maximum value of u g ; I gp , Peak value of i g .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reduce the CMLC, control methods can be changed or extra semiconductors can be added to conventional PV gridconnected inverters. [2][3][4] Nevertheless, variations in the environment and parameters of semiconductors may affect the CMLC. Therefore, a doubly grounded nonisolated grid-connected inverter was presented by directly connecting the grounds of the grid and PV panels, which can eliminate the CMLC thoroughly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bipolar modulation) where the efficiency is relatively low due to the increased power losses (core and switches), and in three-level switching scheme (i.e. unipolar and hybrid modulation) where the efficiency is more than the twolevel one [2]. The main advantage of using non-isolating inverter topologies is its high conversion efficiency, low implementation cost and small size [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%