2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(18)30366-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actividades preventivas en la mujer. Actualización PAPPS 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the domains of AGREE II evaluated (Figure 2A, Table S2), the mean score was 59.4% (SD 18.3%) for “scope and purpose”, 39.4% (SD 21.1%) for “stakeholder involvement”, 32.3% (SD 20.2%) for “rigour of development”, 59.3% (SD 18.2%) for “clarity and presentation”, 27.4% (SD 18.7%) for “applicability”, 42.5% (SD 23.5%) for “editorial independence” and 44.5% (SD 17.5%) for the “overall rating”. As part of the AGREE II appraisal, the reviewers recommended four of the guidelines analysed (11.8%), 57,63,66,80 12 (35.3%) 47‐51,55,59‐61,71,75,76 were recommended with modifications, and 18 (52.9%) 46,52‐54,56,58,62,64,67‐70,72‐74,77‐79 were not recommended for use. Only three guidelines (8.8%) scored over 60% in “Rigour of development domain” and are considered high quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the domains of AGREE II evaluated (Figure 2A, Table S2), the mean score was 59.4% (SD 18.3%) for “scope and purpose”, 39.4% (SD 21.1%) for “stakeholder involvement”, 32.3% (SD 20.2%) for “rigour of development”, 59.3% (SD 18.2%) for “clarity and presentation”, 27.4% (SD 18.7%) for “applicability”, 42.5% (SD 23.5%) for “editorial independence” and 44.5% (SD 17.5%) for the “overall rating”. As part of the AGREE II appraisal, the reviewers recommended four of the guidelines analysed (11.8%), 57,63,66,80 12 (35.3%) 47‐51,55,59‐61,71,75,76 were recommended with modifications, and 18 (52.9%) 46,52‐54,56,58,62,64,67‐70,72‐74,77‐79 were not recommended for use. Only three guidelines (8.8%) scored over 60% in “Rigour of development domain” and are considered high quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, she received a travel payment to attend a day long course by Nutricia on 2019. ALG and PAC are authors of one of the guidelines analysed in this review 62 . To maintain objectivity in the data extraction and quality appraisal process, they did not participate on this part of the study or in any other that implied analysing the guideline they authored.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical practice guidelines now recommend abstaining from alcohol during pregnancy (Beltrán‐Calvo et al., ; García‐Franco et al., ). In Spain, this behavior, especially regular consumption while pregnant, has evolved very similar to alcohol intake among women in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se debe resaltar que para conseguir en población española un riesgo de fracturas en torno al 10%, en mujeres sin otros factores de riesgo, habría que ir a edades en torno a los 72 años).La guía NICE 10 recomienda, sin concretar sobre umbrales de tratamiento o de indicación de densitometría, evaluación sistemática del riesgo de fractura con la herramienta FRAX (véase más adelante) o con el Q-Fracture , a partir de los 65 años; entre 51 y 65 años se aconseja revisar a mujeres con una serie de factores de riesgo (fracturas previas, tratamiento con corticoides, caídas, fractura de cadera en la familia, IMC menor de 18,5, tabaquismo y consumo de alcohol superior a 14 unidades por semana 11 ). El programa de actividades preventivas y de promoción de la salud (PAPPS) 12 de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria (SEMFYC) plantea la indicación de cribado en función del riesgo absoluto de fractura en los siguientes 10 años. En 2016, el PAPPS actualizó sus recomendaciones y se considera Z-score como criterio de intervención (véase más adelante), tal y como corresponde al modelo elaborado por la Dirección General de Farmacia de la Comunidad de Madrid 6 .…”
Section: Criterios De Cribado Y Escalas De Riesgounclassified
“…El programa de actividades preventivas y de promoción de la salud (PAPPS) 12 de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria (SEMFYC) plantea la indicación de cribado en función del riesgo absoluto de fractura en los siguientes 10 años. En 2016, el PAPPS actualizó sus recomendaciones y se considera Z-score como criterio de intervención (véase más adelante), tal y como corresponde al modelo elaborado por la Dirección General de Farmacia de la Comunidad de Madrid 6 .…”
Section: Criterios De Cribado Y Escalas De Riesgounclassified