“…Hocquenghem's notion of "trans-sexualité" seems to have little to do with transsexuality or transgender politics and identity, according to which these words potentially pose a problem that highlights the well-documented tensions between transsexual and queer politics (which do not fall into the remit of this article but I have explored elsewhere). 13 Rather, it appears as a term specific to his understanding of sexuality (rather than identity) as a slippery, non-hierarchical, or, to use Deleuze and Guattari's terminology, rhizomatic and essentially communicative force that refuses to distinguish between subject and object, active and passive, or masculine and feminine.…”