2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ipin.2012.6418902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity and environment classification using foot mounted navigation sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term ω 3,3 at row, column (3,3) in the matrix expresses the inverse covariance of the orientation angle constraint. In the experiments reported in this paper, we set Ω to be equal to the identity matrix with the exception of the term ω 3,3 which was equal to 4 (motion edges and loop-closure edges) or to 0 when the angle constraint was unknown (landmark edges).…”
Section: Graphslammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term ω 3,3 at row, column (3,3) in the matrix expresses the inverse covariance of the orientation angle constraint. In the experiments reported in this paper, we set Ω to be equal to the identity matrix with the exception of the term ω 3,3 which was equal to 4 (motion edges and loop-closure edges) or to 0 when the angle constraint was unknown (landmark edges).…”
Section: Graphslammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that foot-mounted IMUs [3], [38] with the Zero Velocity Update Method typically achieve a far better pedestrian dead reckoning accuracy, because of both better hardware and reduced noise due, as the IMU is attached to the foot that hits the ground as opposed to being stashed loose in a pocket, but they lack the convenience of consumer-grade smartphones casually worn in the pocket.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reddy et al [16] used a mobile phone with a GPS receiver and an accelerometer to determine transportation modes of users, achieving 93.6% classification accuracy with the use of discrete Hidden Markov Models. Bancroft et al [17] used a footmounted device (with GPS receiver and inertial measurement unit) to determine different motion-related activities, such as walking, running, biking, and moving in a vehicle, reporting less than 1% classification error during 99% of measurements. Jin et al [18] detected several motion states using an armbandmounted accelerometer and a "fuzzy inference system," which can marginally be considered as a Machine Learning technique.…”
Section: Related Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed in the medical context, gait signal processing and analysis has been extended to security and navigation applications. Globally, motion recognition techniques are applied to inertial signals recorded with body fixed sensors for inferring the repetitive gait patterns [7,8].…”
Section: Gait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the torso oscillations occurring during normal walking gait [19] will not be reflected by the heading change sensed by the handheld GNSS receiver but will impact the PDR implementation. To cope with the imperfection in sensing the misalignment between the hand's and pedestrian's headings, white process noise is added to the system (7). The fact that the heading sensed by Doppler data through the receiver velocity vector, is also affected by this discrepancy further justifies the additional process noise contributions.…”
Section: A) Doppler Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%