2019
DOI: 10.3233/thc-191731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity-based nutrition management model for healthcare using similar group analysis

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Due to environmental factors such as nutrient intake imbalance, lack of exercise, and increased stress, it is necessary to control nutrition in order to prevent diseases and provide treatment in terms of healthcare. OBJECTIVE: This study proposes the activity-based nutrition management model with the use of the cluster analysis of similar group for healthcare. METHODS: The proposed method is to conduct the cluster analysis of similar group for nutrition management and to develop the real-time activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarity analysis is a method for determining whether parameters are positively or negatively correlated with each other. These correlations are represented within a range of −1 to +1, in which a value closer to −1 indicates that the relationship is moving more in the opposite direction, whereas a value closer to +1 indicates that the relationship is moving more in the same direction [36], [37]. Values closer to 0 indicate a lower mutual impact.…”
Section: B Evaluation Results According To Multi-modal Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity analysis is a method for determining whether parameters are positively or negatively correlated with each other. These correlations are represented within a range of −1 to +1, in which a value closer to −1 indicates that the relationship is moving more in the opposite direction, whereas a value closer to +1 indicates that the relationship is moving more in the same direction [36], [37]. Values closer to 0 indicate a lower mutual impact.…”
Section: B Evaluation Results According To Multi-modal Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, to evaluate context-DNN model, a crossvalidation test is conducted with the use of K -fold. The cross-validation technique can use all data sets as evaluation data and prevents overfitting that arises in a particular evaluation data set [44], [45]. All data sets can be used as training data.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to validate the result of the image classified on the basis of the decision boundary. For validation, precision, recall and F-measure are applied [33], [34]. Precision means a ratio of actual True data to the True data determined by the model.…”
Section: Decision Boundary Calculation Through Anomaly Score For Cmentioning
confidence: 99%