2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity-dependent translation dynamically alters the proteome of the perisynaptic astrocyte process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was studied in both WT and APP/PS1 mice. The animals were sacrificed 4 h post-shock (delayed shock, DS), a timepoint for which we previously showed alterations in proteins expressed in PAPs upon fear memory consolidation ( Rao-Ruiz et al, 2015 ; Sapkota et al, 2022 ). We found impaired contextual fear memory present in APP/PS1 mice at the age of 3 months ( Figure 2A ) which is in line with earlier reports by our group ( Végh et al, 2014 ; Kater et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was studied in both WT and APP/PS1 mice. The animals were sacrificed 4 h post-shock (delayed shock, DS), a timepoint for which we previously showed alterations in proteins expressed in PAPs upon fear memory consolidation ( Rao-Ruiz et al, 2015 ; Sapkota et al, 2022 ). We found impaired contextual fear memory present in APP/PS1 mice at the age of 3 months ( Figure 2A ) which is in line with earlier reports by our group ( Végh et al, 2014 ; Kater et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular mechanism underlying the growth or retraction of the PAP tip remains to be determined, but may involve actin binding proteins, such as Ezrin ( Badia-Soteras et al, 2022 ), Cofilin-1 ( Henneberger et al, 2020 ) or Profilin-1 ( Molotkov et al, 2013 ) and activity-induced translation of such proteins locally in the PAPs ( Sapkota et al, 2022 ). Importantly, these molecular processes seem to be impaired in APP/PS1 mice which do not show PAP retraction upon neuronal stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astrocytes participate in the encoding of memory stimulated after neuronal activity [ 3 ], and sAPPα signaling may play a part in this role. The regulation of translation in astrocytes by neuronal activity is also proposed to be a mechanism by which astrocytes modulate nervous system functioning [ 63 , 64 ]. Astrocytes modulate synaptic function by secreting neurotrophic factors, controlling synaptic formation [ 65 ] and regulating the concentration of neurotransmitters at the synapses [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent work, combining use of astrocyte-specific TRAP with subcellular fractionation, has allowed the purification of ribosomes from astrocyte peripheral processes associated with synapses (synaptosomes), strongly suggesting the possibility of local translation in astrocytes [63]. Furthermore, this local translatome appears to be dynamic and capable of modification by neuronal activity [64,65]. In mice, translation of new proteins appears to drive, at least in part, the proteomic changes that occur in peripheral astrocyte processes following exposure to a fear conditioning paradigm [65], with the resultant behavioral modifications presumably arising due to changes in astrocyte-neuron interactions which impact circuit activity.…”
Section: Transcriptome/proteomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this local translatome appears to be dynamic and capable of modification by neuronal activity [64,65]. In mice, translation of new proteins appears to drive, at least in part, the proteomic changes that occur in peripheral astrocyte processes following exposure to a fear conditioning paradigm [65], with the resultant behavioral modifications presumably arising due to changes in astrocyte-neuron interactions which impact circuit activity. In addition, local protein trafficking appears to play a role in defining the composition of the astrocyte process, in response to neuronal activity.…”
Section: Transcriptome/proteomementioning
confidence: 99%