2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.95.055809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity measurement of Fe60 through the decay of Co60m and confirmation of its half-life

Abstract: The half-life of the neutron-rich nuclide, 60 Fe has been in dispute in recent years. A measurement in 2009 published a value of (2.62 ± 0.04) × 10 6 years, almost twice that of the previously accepted value from 1984 of (1.49 ± 0.27) × 10 6 years. This longer half-life was confirmed in 2015 by a second measurement, resulting in a value of (2.50 ± 0.12) × 10 6 years. All three half-life measurements used the grow-in of the γ-ray lines in 60 Ni from the decay of the ground state of 60 Co (t 1/2 =5.27 years) to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…60 Fe is unstable with a relatively long half-life of 2.62 Myr. This terrestrial half-life is well determined, with two recent experiments (Wallner et al, 2015b;Ostdiek et al, 2017) confirming the half-life of 2.62 Myr presented by Rugel et al (2009), and, initially surprising, 75% longer than the previous standard value (Kutschera et al, 1984). The decay and level scheme is shown in Figure 28.…”
Section: Nuclear Properties Of 60 Fesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…60 Fe is unstable with a relatively long half-life of 2.62 Myr. This terrestrial half-life is well determined, with two recent experiments (Wallner et al, 2015b;Ostdiek et al, 2017) confirming the half-life of 2.62 Myr presented by Rugel et al (2009), and, initially surprising, 75% longer than the previous standard value (Kutschera et al, 1984). The decay and level scheme is shown in Figure 28.…”
Section: Nuclear Properties Of 60 Fesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A number of half-life measurements were performed with this material by several research groups, beginning in 2009 by Rugel et al [14], with a new value of (2.62±0.04)·10 6 years in remarkable disagreement with the formerly accepted value of 1.5·10 6 years of Kutschera et al [15], followed by Wallner et.al. (2.50±0.12)·10 6 years [16]), confirming the " Rugel "-value and a third measurement in Argonne [17] with (2.69±0.28)·10 6 years also in agreement with the latter two. Studies aimed to determine the neutron capture cross section of 60 Fe both at thermal and stellar temperatures have been conducted as well [18, 19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The 60 Fe half‐life has been under debate for the last few decades. The value of T 1/2 = 2.61 ± 0.04 Ma determined by Rugel et al (2009) was confirmed recently by additional independent measurements (Wallner et al 2015; Ostdiek et al 2017). The new value is one order of magnitude higher than the first estimate of T 1/2 = 0.3 ± 0.9 Ma (Roy and Kohman 1957) and ~75% higher than the previously adopted value of T 1/2 = 1.49 ± 0.27 Ma (Kutschera et al 1984).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%