2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.14_suppl.3510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity of cetuximab in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to both irinotecan and oxaliplatin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in a retrospective series of 16 chemo-refractory patients not expressing EGFR, cetuximab was shown to produce an RR of 25% (Chung et al, 2005). In addition, two PR were seen in nine patients with EGFR-negative tumours enrolled in a phase II study of single agent cetuximab (Lenz et al, 2005). It has been shown that the choice of fixative and storage time of tumour tissue, (Atkins et al, 2004) the choice of primary antibody and scoring system (Kersting et al, 2006), and the lack of standardised criteria for evaluation (Langner et al, 2004) all represent potential pitfalls and have a substantial impact on determination of EGFR immunoreactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, in a retrospective series of 16 chemo-refractory patients not expressing EGFR, cetuximab was shown to produce an RR of 25% (Chung et al, 2005). In addition, two PR were seen in nine patients with EGFR-negative tumours enrolled in a phase II study of single agent cetuximab (Lenz et al, 2005). It has been shown that the choice of fixative and storage time of tumour tissue, (Atkins et al, 2004) the choice of primary antibody and scoring system (Kersting et al, 2006), and the lack of standardised criteria for evaluation (Langner et al, 2004) all represent potential pitfalls and have a substantial impact on determination of EGFR immunoreactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[8][9][10][11] Furthermore, response to cetuximab has recently been shown in patients with EGFR-negative colorectal carcinomas. 12,13 Thus, the value of immunohistochemical detection of EGFR in selecting patients for treatment with cetuximab has failed to be borne in our clinical trails. An alternative methodology that offers higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting treatment response would be highly desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, response rates to cetuximab appear comparable irrespective of the EGFR status, including those tumors that are negative for EGFR by immunohistochemistry. 43,44 The EGFR immunoreactivity can vary significantly depending on fixation methodology and storage time of tissue samples. 45 Therefore, there is no rational basis to use EGFR status to select patients for cetuximab based on expression of EGFR in the tumor.…”
Section: Cetuximabmentioning
confidence: 99%